public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fwd: Re: [gnu.org #56622] http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/
@ 2003-08-19  1:43 Pete Gonzalez
  2003-08-21 14:40 ` Nick Clifton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pete Gonzalez @ 2003-08-19  1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: binutils

[sourcemaster@sources.redhat.com suggested that I forward this
to binutils@sources.redhat.com]


----------Forwarded Message---------
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:26:43 -0400
To: D. E. Evans <sinuhe@xmission.com>
From: Pete Gonzalez <gonz@ratloop.com>
Subject: Re: [gnu.org #56622] http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/
Cc: sourcemaster@sources.redhat.com, bug-directory@gnu.org

At 06:52 PM 8/18/2003, D. E. Evans wrote:
> > I make this point because the "snapshots" folder that you link does NOT
> > contain the latest binutils release.
>
>That link is from Red Hat's webpage, not ours.

I'm sorry to keep bothering you.  I've CC'd this e-mail to what I believe
are the appropriate addresses.

This is the "binutils" listing you referred me to in the GNU Free Software
Directory:

         http://www.gnu.org/directory/binutils.html

It lists the current version of binutils as "2.13.1", and under "obtaining"
it links the RedHat web site:

         http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/

Now, the RedHat page lists the current version as "2.14", although
(as I mentioned) the "snapshots" FTP directory in the "Obtaining binutils"
section there does not actually have 2.14 or 2.13.1.  It sounds like you
are saying this is not GNU's page, so I should be e-mailing RedHat about
this.  However, the footer on the RedHat web page says "Please send
comments on these web pages to webmasters@www.gnu.org".

It would seem that the following things need to happen:

- gnu.org should update their directory page to link 2.14 instead of 2.13.1

- redhat.com should replace "webmasters@www.gnu.org" with the RedHat webmaster

- Both pages should add a link to ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils, since this is
   apparently the only directory that is kept up to date with the official 
releases

The reason that I'm clamoring about this is that I have downloaded and
built the wrong tarball on three separate occasions before finally figuring
out my mistake.  Honest I'm not actually stupid, I'm just effectively that way
when in a hurry.  :-)

Thanks,
-Pete

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: Re: [gnu.org #56622] http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/
  2003-08-19  1:43 Fwd: Re: [gnu.org #56622] http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/ Pete Gonzalez
@ 2003-08-21 14:40 ` Nick Clifton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2003-08-21 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pete Gonzalez; +Cc: binutils

Hi Pete,

> - redhat.com should replace "webmasters@www.gnu.org" with the RedHat webmaster
>
> - Both pages should add a link to ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils, since this is
>    apparently the only directory that is kept up to date with the
>    official releases

I have taken care of these points for the page hosted on
sources.redhat.com.

The FTP server on sources.redhat.com appears to be down at the moment,
but I have left the link to it on the web page intact, on the
assumption that it will be restored at some point.

Cheers
        Nick
        

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-21 14:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-19  1:43 Fwd: Re: [gnu.org #56622] http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/ Pete Gonzalez
2003-08-21 14:40 ` Nick Clifton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).