From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-76946-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27462 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2012 16:51:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 27441 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2012 16:51:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:51:04 +0000
Received: by qafk30 with SMTP id k30so1941713qaf.0        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.178.133 with SMTP id bm5mr26020791qab.1.1346518263688;        Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pebble.twiddle.home ([173.160.232.49])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a13sm9307204qad.18.2012.09.01.09.51.01        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50423CF8.7000309@twiddle.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 16:51:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
CC: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,  David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, aj@suse.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,  Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390: Fix two issues with the IFUNC optimized mem* routines
References: <503E009B.3080302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAMe9rOrmiF3VZOBNvEbMV5jFNog1-_EoPoT9rHTUQFsANaSD8w@mail.gmail.com> <503E3930.5040603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120829.125208.824114683359549094.davem@davemloft.net> <503F14A3.8070801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAMe9rOozW=4q_a=nmNvbZhsXooRZ4opvTTNtq2WHcGSSd2ONOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOpc7KHMXk8xrQV3p2fAn-uTWZJ91R6k=DbCXENs43Kemw@mail.gmail.com> <5040CCC6.4030809@twiddle.net> <CAMe9rOr2Vic9vENNbRf5_z22-kMS2Uu-6Lsgd_Xi6bctw6CF4w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOr2Vic9vENNbRf5_z22-kMS2Uu-6Lsgd_Xi6bctw6CF4w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

On 2012-08-31 11:09, H.J. Lu wrote:
> This is an excellent idea.  But  relax_section is too late for
> x86 and x86-64.  I need to do it in size_dynamic_sections
> so that we can get proper GOT entries.

It's not too late.  Look at some of the other ports.


r~