From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-76949-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17805 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2012 21:25:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 17787 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2012 21:25:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-qa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 21:24:58 +0000
Received: by qady1 with SMTP id y1so2018300qad.0        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.135.20 with SMTP id l20mr7331548qct.83.1346534697353;        Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pebble.twiddle.home ([173.160.232.49])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g13sm9704177qah.5.2012.09.01.14.24.55        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <50427D29.1010205@twiddle.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 21:25:00 -0000
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
CC: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,  David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, aj@suse.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,  Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390: Fix two issues with the IFUNC optimized mem* routines
References: <503E009B.3080302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAMe9rOrmiF3VZOBNvEbMV5jFNog1-_EoPoT9rHTUQFsANaSD8w@mail.gmail.com> <503E3930.5040603@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120829.125208.824114683359549094.davem@davemloft.net> <503F14A3.8070801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <CAMe9rOozW=4q_a=nmNvbZhsXooRZ4opvTTNtq2WHcGSSd2ONOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOpc7KHMXk8xrQV3p2fAn-uTWZJ91R6k=DbCXENs43Kemw@mail.gmail.com> <5040CCC6.4030809@twiddle.net> <CAMe9rOr2Vic9vENNbRf5_z22-kMS2Uu-6Lsgd_Xi6bctw6CF4w@mail.gmail.com> <50423CF8.7000309@twiddle.net> <CAMe9rOor=+aUhtadjDWzT9gHJvteZouk7-cvF_U=k=2vdFgsNA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOor=+aUhtadjDWzT9gHJvteZouk7-cvF_U=k=2vdFgsNA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2

On 2012-09-01 10:21, H.J. Lu wrote:
> It may work for other targets.  But x86 doesn't have a relax
> pass.  I believe doing it in size_dynamic_sections is more
> sensible.

It *should* have a relax pass.  Especially as that allows one
to turn it all off just in case a bug is encountered.

r~