From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Kaushik Phatak <Kaushik.Phatak@kpitcummins.com>
Cc: nick clifton <nickc@redhat.com>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
"binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] New port: CR16: BFD Changes required by the gdb port
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EC5D58.3010503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848565B08@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
On 01/08/2013 11:24 AM, Kaushik Phatak wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> Thanks for applying these changes with appropriate Changelogs.
>
> I noticed that the entries for cr16 were missing in the latest gdb snapshot
> in configure.ac and configure.
>
> cr16-*-*)
> noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb"
> ;;
> This entry is present in the 7.5 release version of gdb but not
> in the latest snapshot, gdb-7.5.50.20130108
>
> How is this controlled, in gcc or here? Could you please throw some light on this.
On gdb's git mirror, I see:
commit ce3c5eda0b8d664790bc633a1013193a3289dff0
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Aug 26 14:34:38 2012 +0000
Sync toplevel files with GCC tree
...
- cr16-*-*)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb"
- ;;
d10v-*-*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss"
;;
@@ -924,7 +939,8 @@ case "${target}" in
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl ld"
;;
ia64*-*-*vms*)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl"
+ # No ld support yet.
+ noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl ld"
;;
i[[3456789]]86-w64-mingw*)
;;
@@ -1069,16 +1085,13 @@ case "${host}" in
*-mingw*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-mingw"
;;
- *-interix*)
- host_makefile_frag="config/mh-interix"
- ;;
hppa*-hp-hpux10*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa-hpux10"
;;
hppa*-hp-hpux*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa"
;;
- hppa*-*)
+ hppa*-*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa"
;;
Dunno why these were removed with that merge. The
ChangeLog entries brought in don't seen to
mention these changes. Maybe it was a merge error
where local binutils changes were lost?
> Please let me know if I need to submit any patch for this as couple of hunks
> from my gdb patch are failing due to this.
Please always base the work you submit against the current
development mainline. For GDB, that is:
http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-08 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 7:04 Kaushik Phatak
2012-12-14 18:52 ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-28 12:18 ` Kaushik Phatak
2013-01-02 13:14 ` nick clifton
2013-01-03 11:16 ` Kaushik Phatak
2013-01-07 15:11 ` nick clifton
2013-01-08 11:24 ` Kaushik Phatak
2013-01-08 17:54 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-01-15 9:24 ` Kaushik Phatak
2013-01-02 14:19 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50EC5D58.3010503@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=Kaushik.Phatak@kpitcummins.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nickc@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).