From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14596 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2013 01:02:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14585 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2013 01:02:51 -0000 Received: from intranet.asianux.com (HELO intranet.asianux.com) (58.214.24.6) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:02:51 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HELO_MISC_IP,KHOP_DNSBL_BUMP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,RCVD_VIA_APNIC,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: intranet.asianux.com Received: by intranet.asianux.com (Postfix, from userid 103) id 53D8F18403D1; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:02:44 +0800 (CST) X-Spam-Score: -100.9 Received: from [10.1.100.108] (unknown [61.148.203.198]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by intranet.asianux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFADB1840242; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:02:43 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <5238FB76.206@asianux.com> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:02:00 -0000 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nick clifton CC: binutils@sourceware.org, Guenter Roeck , Yoshinori Sato , Jeff Law Subject: Re: [Suggestion] about h8/300 architecture in gcc and binutils References: <522E7255.6080301@asianux.com> <522E744C.10403@asianux.com> <52385F14.3070503@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <52385F14.3070503@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 On 09/17/2013 09:54 PM, nick clifton wrote: > Hi Chen, >> After google search and check the Linux kernel, H8/300 is dead, and for >> gcc-4.9.0 and binutils-2.23.2 still has h8300, do we still need it for >> another OS ? > > Yes. > > The H8/300 target is still be used by lots of different groups. Just > because the Linux kernel no longer supports it, that does not mean that > the entire toolchain is redundant. > OK, thank you for your information. After some trying, it proves, I am really a newbie for gcc and binutils. I try to fix one of issues (already on Bugzilla) within 2013-09-19, it seems I will be fail (because of my very low efficient analyzing, and have to do another things too). But I am still continue trying... Welcome any suggestions or completions, thanks. > Cheers > Nick > > > > Thanks. -- Chen Gang