From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-83258-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7887 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2014 16:49:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 7819 invoked by uid 89); 26 Mar 2014 16:49:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: service87.mimecast.com
Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:49:08 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:49:05 +0000
Received: from [10.1.208.33] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);	 Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:49:19 +0000
Message-ID: <53330500.60906@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:49:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com>
CC: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>,  "binutils@sourceware.org Development" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [Mach-O, committed]: Add definition for arm64 cpu
References: <470024C4-4E3C-43BD-A80B-BBD0EC8B8392@adacore.com> <5332FF52.7010402@arm.com>	<6DBF330F-D3D1-48FD-B9D4-7595E5583DDC@adacore.com> <CAFqB+PyAoAyFwwU9qj5uGKfSHLUA-peH+XFX=599ff4nDRYePQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFqB+PyAoAyFwwU9qj5uGKfSHLUA-peH+XFX=599ff4nDRYePQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-MC-Unique: 114032616490500301
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2

On 26/03/14 16:43, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 26 March 2014 16:34, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>=20
>> In fact it is consistent with the macro name defined by Apple :-(
>> Hard to be consistent with two non-consistent usages.
>=20
> That justification does not hold for the name string in bfd_mach_o_cpu_na=
me[].
>=20
> /Marcus
>=20

Nor does it hold for the internal names, eg BFD_MACH_O_CPU_TYPE_ARM64

R.