From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23982 invoked by alias); 29 May 2014 13:23:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 23960 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2014 13:23:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: service87.mimecast.com Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 May 2014 13:23:23 +0000 Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Thu, 29 May 2014 14:23:20 +0100 Received: from [10.1.208.33] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 29 May 2014 14:23:19 +0100 Message-ID: <538734C8.4030300@arm.com> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 13:23:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Corsepius CC: "binutils@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Require GNU make? References: <201405201619.s4KGJpRg002591@ignucius.se.axis.com> <201405281315.s4SDFpU2031819@ignucius.se.axis.com> <20140528141505.GJ6679@bubble.grove.modra.org> <53870721.3080402@redhat.com> <53872DEC.1050209@arm.com> <538730C1.6040105@rtems.org> In-Reply-To: <538730C1.6040105@rtems.org> X-MC-Unique: 114052914232005801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00269.txt.bz2 On 29/05/14 14:06, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/29/2014 02:54 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >=20 >> Not directly relevant, but I put a feature into the newlib build earlier >> this year that relied on a GNU make extension. There were no objections >> at the time I did that. > Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC, GCC already requires gmake. > As newlib is commonly used with GCC, probably everybody who uses newlib=20 > also uses gmake :-) >=20 > Ralf >=20 >=20 Possibly. As I said, it's not directly relevant... I tend to build all off gcc/binutils/gdb/newlib in one go, so always use gmake for the lot. R.