* Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
@ 2005-03-31 16:02 Christian Joensson
2005-03-31 16:15 ` Christian Joensson
2005-04-01 11:03 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Joensson @ 2005-03-31 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.94.0.2-1.sparc
bison-1.875c-2.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch
expect-5.42.1-1.sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc.sparc
kernel-2.6.11-1.1166sp1.sparc64
package kernel-devel is not installed
package kernel-smp is not installed
libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
make-3.80-5.sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
tcl-8.4.7-2.sparc
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 31 14:17:15 UTC 2005
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 33
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 88
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
FAIL: S-records with constructors
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 237
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 5
version: 2.16.90 20050331
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-64-bit-bfd --prefix=/usr/local/binutils
Counting all warnings,
there are 18 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
6 libiberty/regex.c
2 include/xregex2.h
Number of warning types:
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
2 ISO C90 does not support \`???' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
EOF
Mail -s "Results for s 5
version: 2.16.90 20050331
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-64-bit-bfd --prefix=/usr/local/binutils
Counting all warnings,
there are 18 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
6 libiberty/regex.c
2 include/xregex2.h
Number of warning types:
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
2 ISO C90 does not support \`???' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-03-31 16:02 Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu Christian Joensson
@ 2005-03-31 16:15 ` Christian Joensson
2005-04-01 11:03 ` Nick Clifton
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Joensson @ 2005-03-31 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:05:18 +0200, Christian Joensson
<christian.joensson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
>
> binutils-2.15.94.0.2-1.sparc
> bison-1.875c-2.sparc
> dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch
> expect-5.42.1-1.sparc
> gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc
> glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
> glibc-2.3.3-99.sparc64
> glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc64
> glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc
> glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc64
> glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc
> glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc.sparc
> kernel-2.6.11-1.1166sp1.sparc64
> package kernel-devel is not installed
> package kernel-smp is not installed
> libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
> libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
> libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
> make-3.80-5.sparc
> nptl-devel-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
> tcl-8.4.7-2.sparc
>
> LAST_UPDATED: Thu Mar 31 14:17:15 UTC 2005
>
> Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
>
> === binutils tests ===
>
> Running target unix
>
> === binutils Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 33
> === gas tests ===
>
> Running target unix
>
> === gas Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 88
> === ld tests ===
>
> Running target unix
> FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
> FAIL: S-records with constructors
from the log file:
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/../gas/as-new -o
tmpdir/tlssunbin32.o --32
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc/tlssunbin32.s
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/ld-new -o
tmpdir/tlssunbin32 -L/usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-sparc
-melf32_sparc tmpdir/libtlslib32.so tmpdir/tlssunbinpic32.o
tmpdir/tlssunbin32.o
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/../binutils/readelf -WSsrl
tmpdir/tlssunbin32 > dump.out
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ +\[ 9\] .dynamic +DYNAMIC +0+231f8 0+31f8 0+80 08 +WA +4 +0 +4$"
line " [ 9] .dynamic DYNAMIC 000231f4 0031f4
000080 08 WA 4 0 4"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ +\[10\] .got +PROGBITS +0+23278 0+3278 0+14 04 +WA +0 +0 +4$"
line " [10] .got PROGBITS 00023274 003274
000014 04 WA 0 0 4"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ +LOAD +0x0+2194 0x0+22194 0x0+22194 0x0+10f8 0x0+10f8 RWE 0x10000$"
line " LOAD 0x002194 0x00022194 0x00022194 0x010f4
0x010f4 RWE 0x10000"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ +DYNAMIC +0x0+31f8 0x0+231f8 0x0+231f8 0x0+80 0x0+80 RW +0x4$"
line " DYNAMIC 0x0031f4 0x000231f4 0x000231f4 0x00080 0x00080 RW 0x4"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^0002327c +0000014e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 +00000000 +sG5 \+ 0$"
line "00023278 0000014e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 00000000 sG5 + 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^00023280 +0000034e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 +00000000 +sG2 \+ 0$"
line "0002327c 0000034e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 00000000 sG2 + 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^00023284 +0000074e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 +00000000 +sG6 \+ 0$"
line "00023280 0000074e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 00000000 sG6 + 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^00023288 +0000084e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 +00000000 +sG1 \+ 0$"
line "00023284 0000084e R_SPARC_TLS_TPOFF32 00000000 sG1 + 0"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ +2: 0+231f8 +0 OBJECT +GLOBAL DEFAULT +ABS _DYNAMIC$"
line " 2: 000231f4 0 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _DYNAMIC"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ +[0-9]+: 0+231f8 +0 OBJECT +GLOBAL DEFAULT +ABS _DYNAMIC$"
line " 36: 000231f4 0 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS _DYNAMIC"
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^ +[0-9]+: 0+23278 +0 OBJECT +GLOBAL +HIDDEN +10 _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_$"
line " 61: 00023274 0 OBJECT GLOBAL HIDDEN 10 _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_"
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions
and
g++4 -m32 -L/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/./ld -g -O2
-fno-exceptions
-B/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/tmpdir/gas/
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-srec -g -O -c
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-srec/sr3.cc -o tmpdir/sr3.o
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/sr1
--traditional-format -Ttext 0x1000 tmpdir/sr3.o
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/sr2.sr
--traditional-format -Ttext 0x1000 --oformat srec tmpdir/sr3.o
/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/ld/../binutils/objcopy -O srec
tmpdir/sr1 tmpdir/sr1.sr
comparison failure 3:
S21400100005000044C200A26C82006001C220A26CEF
S21400100005000044C200A27082006001C220A270E7
FAIL: S-records with constructors
testcase /usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-srec/srec.exp
completed in 3 seconds
> === ld Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 237
> # of unexpected failures 2
> # of expected failures 5
>
> version: 2.16.90 20050331
> Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
> configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-64-bit-bfd --prefix=/usr/local/binutils
> Counting all warnings,
> there are 18 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
>
> Number of warnings per file:
> 10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
> 6 libiberty/regex.c
> 2 include/xregex2.h
>
> Number of warning types:
> 10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
> 6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
> 2 ISO C90 does not support \`???' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
> EOF
> Mail -s "Results for s 5
>
> version: 2.16.90 20050331
> Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
> configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-64-bit-bfd --prefix=/usr/local/binutils
> Counting all warnings,
> there are 18 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
>
> Number of warnings per file:
> 10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
> 6 libiberty/regex.c
> 2 include/xregex2.h
>
> Number of warning types:
> 10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
> 6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
> 2 ISO C90 does not support \`???' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
>
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-03-31 16:02 Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu Christian Joensson
2005-03-31 16:15 ` Christian Joensson
@ 2005-04-01 11:03 ` Nick Clifton
2005-04-01 11:41 ` Christian Joensson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2005-04-01 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Joensson; +Cc: binutils
Hi Christian,
> Number of warning types:
> 10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
Is it just me or is the suggested replacement character format the same
as the format that your compiler is complaining about ?
> 2 ISO C90 does not support \`???' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
Do you have the file names and line numbers for these warnings ?
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-04-01 11:03 ` Nick Clifton
@ 2005-04-01 11:41 ` Christian Joensson
2005-04-01 13:32 ` Nick Clifton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christian Joensson @ 2005-04-01 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Clifton; +Cc: binutils
On Apr 1, 2005 1:01 PM, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> > Number of warning types:
> > 10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
>
> Is it just me or is the suggested replacement character format the same
> as the format that your compiler is complaining about ?
>
> > 2 ISO C90 does not support \`???' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
>
> Do you have the file names and line numbers for these warnings ?
This is using gcc 4.0... and the warnings are these (using cvs trunk
LAST_UPDATE: Fri Apr 1 11:10:42 UTC 2005)
if [ x"`case '-g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' in *-fpic* ) echo
-fpic ;; * ) echo -fPIC ;; esac`" != x ]; then \
gcc4 -m32 -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I.
-I/usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/../include -W -Wall -pedantic
`case '-g -O2 -g -O2 -fno-implicit-templates' in *-fpic* ) echo -fpic
;; * ) echo -fPIC ;; esac` /usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c
-o pic/regex.o; \
else true; fi
In file included from /usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/../include/xregex.h:26,
from /usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c:191:
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/../include/xregex2.h:538: warning:
ISO C90 does not support 'static' or type qualifiers in parameter
array declarators
In file included from /usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c:636:
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c: In function 'byte_compile_range':
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c:4485: warning: signed and
unsigned type in conditional expression
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c:4495: warning: signed and
unsigned type in conditional expression
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c:4495: warning: signed and
unsigned type in conditional expression
gcc4 -m32 -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g
-O2 -o .libs/size size.o bucomm.o version.o filemode.o
../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so
-L/usr/local/src/trunk/objdir-binutils32/libiberty/pic -liberty
../libiberty/libiberty.a -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib
bucomm.o(.text+0x49c): In function `make_tempname':
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c:425: warning: the use of
`mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
(and a few identical ones)
--
Cheers,
/ChJ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
2005-04-01 11:41 ` Christian Joensson
@ 2005-04-01 13:32 ` Nick Clifton
[not found] ` <5460e333050401061537a08078@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nick Clifton @ 2005-04-01 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Joensson; +Cc: binutils
Hi Christian,
> This is using gcc 4.0... and the warnings are these (using cvs trunk
> LAST_UPDATE: Fri Apr 1 11:10:42 UTC 2005)
> /usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/../include/xregex2.h:538: warning:
> ISO C90 does not support 'static' or type qualifiers in parameter
> array declarators
> /usr/local/src/trunk/src/libiberty/regex.c:4485: warning: signed and
> unsigned type in conditional expression
Ah - these are for the regex library which is not part of binutils, so I
am not going to worry about them.
> bucomm.o(.text+0x49c): In function `make_tempname':
> /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c:425: warning: the use of
> `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
Yes, that old chestnut. One day in my copious free time I'll fix this.
Cheers
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-05 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-31 16:02 Results for 2.16.90 20050331 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu Christian Joensson
2005-03-31 16:15 ` Christian Joensson
2005-04-01 11:03 ` Nick Clifton
2005-04-01 11:41 ` Christian Joensson
2005-04-01 13:32 ` Nick Clifton
[not found] ` <5460e333050401061537a08078@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <424D5830.2090802@redhat.com>
2005-04-05 8:53 ` Christian Joensson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).