Re: gas testsuite FAIL: macros dot [Was: Results for 2.16.90 20050412 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-g

Re: gas testsuite FAIL: macros dot [Was: Results for 2.16.90 20050412 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-g

[Jan Beulich]

How can an unknown opcode be a fatal error? Certainly, the testcase could be adjusted for that, but I think the target's making this more severe than it should be. Jan

>>> Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com> 12.04.05 08:15:12 >>>
On Apr 12, 2005 8:08 AM, Christian Joensson
<christian.joensson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
> 
> binutils-2.16.90.0.1-1.sparc
> bison-1.875c-2.sparc
> dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch
> expect-5.42.1-1.sparc
> gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc
> glibc-2.3.3-99.sparc64
> glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
> glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc
> glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc64
> glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc64
> glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc
> glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc.sparc
> gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc
> gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64
> gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc
> gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64
> kernel-2.6.11-1.1166sp1.sparc64
> package kernel-devel is not installed
> package kernel-smp is not installed
> libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
> libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
> libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
> libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
> make-3.80-5.sparc
> nptl-devel-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
> tcl-8.4.7-2.sparc
> 
> LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 12 05:27:33 UTC 2005
> 
> Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
> 
>                === binutils tests ===
> 
> Running target unix
> 
>                === binutils Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes            33
>                === gas tests ===
> 
> Running target unix
> FAIL: macros dot

From the log file:

Executing /usr/local/src/trunk/src/gas/testsuite/lib/run ../as-new 
-alm /usr/local/src/trunk/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s
>&dump.out
regexp_diff match failure
regexp "^.*:28: Error: .*$"
line   "/usr/local/src/trunk/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.s:28:
Fatal error: Unknown opcode: `x.y.z 0'"
extra regexps in
/usr/local/src/trunk/src/gas/testsuite/gas/macros/dot.l starting with
"^(.* )?GAS .*$"
EOF from dump.out
FAIL: macros dot

>                === gas Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes            88
> # of unexpected failures        1
>                === ld tests ===
> 
> Running target unix
> FAIL: S-records with constructors
> 
>                === ld Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes            238
> # of unexpected failures        1
> # of expected failures          5
> 
> version: 2.16.90 20050412
> Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
> configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
> --enable-64-bit-bfd --prefix=/usr/local/binutils
> Counting all warnings,
> there are 30 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
> 
> Number of warnings per file:
>     10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
>      8 libiberty/regex.c
>      4 libiberty/pexecute.c
>      4 libiberty/getpwd.c
>      2 include/xregex2.h
>      2 include/getopt.h
> 
> Number of warning types:
>     10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
>      6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
>      6 function declaration isn't a prototype
>      4 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
>      2 return discards qualifiers from pointer target type
>      2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in
> parameter array declarators
> 


-- 
Cheers,

/ChJ

Re: gas testsuite FAIL: macros dot [Was: Results for 2.16.90 20050412 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-g

[Christian Joensson]

On 4/12/05, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> How can an unknown opcode be a fatal error? Certainly, the testcase could be adjusted for that, but I think the target's making this more severe than it should be. Jan

Now, http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=848

-- 
Cheers,

/ChJ