From: Christian Joensson <christian.joensson@gmail.com>
To: binutils <binutils@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Results for 2.16.90 20050415 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5460e33305041508243572d178@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.16.90.0.1-1.sparc
bison-1.875c-2.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2.noarch
expect-5.42.1-1.sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc.sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc
glibc-devel-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99.sparc
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-20sparc.sparc
gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc
gmp-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64
gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc
gmp-devel-4.1.4-3sparc.sparc64
kernel-2.6.11-1.1166sp1.sparc64
package kernel-devel is not installed
package kernel-smp is not installed
libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libgcc-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
libstdc++-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc64
libstdc++-devel-3.4.2-6.fc3.sparc
make-3.80-5.sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.3-99.sparcv9
tcl-8.4.7-2.sparc
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 15 13:02:00 UTC 2005
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 33
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: macros dot
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 90
# of unexpected failures 1
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 246
# of expected failures 5
version: 2.16.90 20050415
Platform: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
--enable-64-bit-bfd --prefix=/usr/local/binutils
Counting all warnings,
there are 30 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
8 libiberty/regex.c
4 libiberty/pexecute.c
4 libiberty/getpwd.c
2 include/xregex2.h
2 include/getopt.h
Number of warning types:
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
6 function declaration isn't a prototype
4 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2 return discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in
parameter array declarators
reply other threads:[~2005-04-15 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5460e33305041508243572d178@mail.gmail.com \
--to=christian.joensson@gmail.com \
--cc=binutils@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).