From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F3D3858D26 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:14:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 99F3D3858D26 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1667466888; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=coyjoZCMK96slDxWuRMEVX791j739QE2QA7VKjgw+eg=; b=Qyiyi7Z9sAGV6Cmz/dJ6tISgi6kcFMvvQ74tN+VhIpC0/kE3ZL3gf8jjs8oVznI00vT7bC 0M2yHdVsOIfLmbupmDXXB6/aLStGPWxuhOLLF7SwCRjgYb8KnmT2RB4Q1D3eoJ34/ChH+b qNtcb8j2cuSsZkiYd1b+g0et+O8pRyk= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-386-MeQ4ykgCNhOzDEw9XzXd6w-1; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 05:14:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MeQ4ykgCNhOzDEw9XzXd6w-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m34-20020a05600c3b2200b003cf549cb32bso2353040wms.1 for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 02:14:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=coyjoZCMK96slDxWuRMEVX791j739QE2QA7VKjgw+eg=; b=BrEA4QR2GroleQfVel1zMyfz5i4jIKlJScGzIUFGegtGSh3zSIqOYtByKOISENyZF5 DYb9+LMQRhpyXScfuTjIKeDaLuJe533mEBZ49tN4KQbsYbgQ1urJufvTYAhooHp8Xwyv +ZuYZWFhj0AqJYr6GR/SWIGUeQYESsaRxiAybL+Jc5YfQsMexvwK1vN0RSbjSQcQXHba 5AtpY2TM0Vr6voxZmRu+b6PFS1tqiQDELJjM//r53mMTN0qvkqSqwERDqpKUtYZUUtKN /cr6GGB8MQqIig8r2FUDkQVdOycBhTpPau/nT6Vd+ichC/TxaXLqlZN6Nya1a7idUgzM IQBg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1ZbutdCaaCFkYLuJI8yxAFXP42g5Pc3wzy8PDiFG4fiD1Qzvhi /jsQxUC8YQ5M4OPfcv/F4SDdO2lT/Ygoomg07oMKjAU+5XqwGTAuKM2yHD7lK/Rc4R19guArcL1 5IkjUqEGVSSPCqTnFYA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b608:0:b0:236:d95e:2b1 with SMTP id f8-20020adfb608000000b00236d95e02b1mr10893390wre.569.1667466885189; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 02:14:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5re78bmq3kA0tK7CLmDljTKmqY1+Mh2ur1hhM2TmyMKiYOLrq0V4WLlTrmaLkH0zMNRsqLPQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b608:0:b0:236:d95e:2b1 with SMTP id f8-20020adfb608000000b00236d95e02b1mr10893374wre.569.1667466884928; Thu, 03 Nov 2022 02:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (adsl-164-85.freeuk.com. [80.168.164.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k17-20020a05600c1c9100b003c6d21a19a0sm692174wms.29.2022.11.03.02.14.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2022 02:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <553b4666-0941-746b-d1f2-7ca47a1bb17b@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:14:43 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [opcodes/arm] Fix potential null pointer dereferences To: Luis Machado , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20221103071519.3510462-1-luis.machado@arm.com> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: <20221103071519.3510462-1-luis.machado@arm.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Luis, > PR 29598: dereferenced null pointer in arm-dis.c > > As pointed out in the bug ticket, we have a couple potential null pointer > dereferencing situations for mapping_symbol_for_insn. Harden those. Approved - please apply. Cheers Nick