public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>
To: "nickc@redhat.com" <nickc@redhat.com>,
	Sudakshina Das <Sudi.Das@arm.com>,
	"binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	"peter.smith@linaro.org" <peter.smith@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, BFD, LD, AArch64, 0/4] Add support for AArch64 BTI and PAC in the linker
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5653d89c-3239-df8f-6a62-07c0fa189387@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <054d9601-0009-2227-3155-1c013beb74dd@redhat.com>

On 08/03/2019 10:07, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Sudi,
> 
>>> OK, so just to be clear, with --bti or --bti-nowarn the output will be
>>> given the BTI tag *even if* some of the input files do not have the BTI note ?
> 
>> Yes
> 
>> can go back and check the objects that need recompiling or use 
>> --bti-nowarn when they are sure that even if there is any object with 
>> missing BTI note section it is still safe to turn on BTI (or they still 
>> want to turn on BTI). We think that these options would be most helpful 
>> in early deployment.
> 
> OK, well I get the --bti option then, but I still think that --bti-nowarn
> is a mistake.  Given that --bti will only generate warnings if there are
> object files without the BTI note, and warnings can be ignored, I do not
> see the need for --bti-nowarn.  Plus using --bti-nowarn could potentially
> cause problems if the developer forgets (or does not know) that it is
> enabled, and they end up thinking that they are creating BTI enabled
> binaries when in fact they are not.

Given this conversation, maybe renaming --bti to --force-bti would 
express the intention clearer ?


regards
Ramana
> 
> Cheers
>    Nick
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-08 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-06 10:26 Sudakshina Das
2019-03-06 10:31 ` [PATCH, BFD, LD, AArch64, 1/4] Add support for GNU PROPERTIES in AArch64 for BTI and PAC Sudakshina Das
2019-03-06 10:34   ` [PATCH, BFD, LD, AArch64, 2/4] Add --bti-nowarn to enable BTI without warning and to select BTI enabled PLTs Sudakshina Das
2019-03-06 10:36     ` [PATCH, BFD, LD, AArch64, 3/4] Add --bti to enable BTI and select BTI enabled PLTs but also warn for missing NOTE sections Sudakshina Das
2019-03-06 10:39       ` [PATCH, BFD, LD, AArch64, 4/4] Add --pac-plt to enable PLTs protected with PAC Sudakshina Das
2019-04-11 14:47         ` Szabolcs Nagy
2019-03-07 12:37 ` [PATCH, BFD, LD, AArch64, 0/4] Add support for AArch64 BTI and PAC in the linker Nick Clifton
2019-03-07 14:28   ` Sudakshina Das
2019-03-07 15:26     ` Peter Smith
2019-03-07 15:35       ` Nick Clifton
2019-03-07 15:49         ` Szabolcs Nagy
2019-03-07 15:33     ` Nick Clifton
2019-03-07 17:53       ` Sudakshina Das
2019-03-08 10:07         ` Nick Clifton
2019-03-08 11:08           ` Szabolcs Nagy
2019-03-08 11:14           ` Ramana Radhakrishnan [this message]
2019-03-08 11:46             ` Peter Smith
2019-03-08 12:32               ` Nick Clifton
2019-03-08 12:44                 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2019-03-08 13:36                   ` Sudakshina Das
2019-03-11 12:30                     ` Nick Clifton
2019-03-13 11:49                       ` Sudakshina Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5653d89c-3239-df8f-6a62-07c0fa189387@arm.com \
    --to=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=Sudi.Das@arm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.smith@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).