From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60117 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2019 13:51:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 60106 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2019 13:51:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:9d62b2e, H*f:sk:9d62b2e, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:51:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFBC530BC665; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.116.189] (ovpn-116-189.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.189]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 390445D77D; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH, binutils, ARM, 0/16] Add support for Armv8.1-M Mainline To: "Andre Vieira (lists)" , binutils@sourceware.org References: <9d62b2e9-80fb-1b31-2271-79ad052f8a25@arm.com> From: Nick Clifton Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <5798f7d9-3059-98d7-8d02-9dd39adce0f6@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 13:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9d62b2e9-80fb-1b31-2271-79ad052f8a25@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-04/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 Hi Andre, > Thanks for that! Most of them were testisms.  Though there was an actual issue with big-endian and the LE instruction.  I replied to each relevant patch with an updated version. Great - in which case the patch series is approved. Do you need to me ACK each of them individually, or is this approval enough ? Cheers Nick