From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E35E3858C54 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:02:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0E35E3858C54 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1668441778; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5miodXD6flVJJGhvAoji+Kvyk2fFXB4IwSp7dUpz7Mo=; b=HP9w7rSMwXfS3UuJjg7FhVTEphjAFqAdO/HcEdnSn4Jj1hXqNDxys5OesPAgLDyQX4G2mx NZMLwzMO6LVBTTXgh2a7JqLX579T8xlAPSu0AXolZWvT/Or4VN7eKS2CmZFSMv5Ps9zB86 Q4KTCxWavBPd1rN+HVEYg4MAKEkMOm8= Received: from mail-qt1-f199.google.com (mail-qt1-f199.google.com [209.85.160.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-192-ZHDWBlazPSCmaIzrv0w8sA-1; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:02:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ZHDWBlazPSCmaIzrv0w8sA-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f199.google.com with SMTP id i4-20020ac813c4000000b003a5044a818cso8331713qtj.11 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:02:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5miodXD6flVJJGhvAoji+Kvyk2fFXB4IwSp7dUpz7Mo=; b=IXTXdsJM0Ls3LWv3Lz3TpqF/9k6pY6koDvtgCbaZxGId70ZNABQAayErXF0+jA0HrT OEFyEGNPK9FzmcFaXCNQ6iOnYIHTLYK8tqP37Id14JzgM5yUv39lr0hHfuuUVOSrOOVn Ovhx7SqhgOVN2y1cMRB6g1cmEeHZPDD5/SdkZuk7K0VqcAn4/jy1pslIxjlrFFr4/gPv R7hj//8KCgT3wGnJRSGO+XPgvrWbJFKAusEgy2K1TTwDFTT8eE4smRYTKuNjpBxze0Pa IBsfnZVTwMPQF9JB6yzuQ45qMHhksz0WyKfvOyQfZy+nxnAO9RH7uemDXf/F7NzXUgWx zgfw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plANQP30PBix1aA6plw3XDVgmaRA5+4brRIocIYJK5f7Cu4H2me 2nT1X+7iCXQqiic+razifL/OIsdyRlyZS4uB515VCdzFX6NRcBU85QpjpNNHeUFXzTK0JXrchfa vrTVWbW0ICgvz/ZhNMA== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:8dcb:0:b0:4c6:51b9:1b3 with SMTP id u11-20020a0c8dcb000000b004c651b901b3mr830242qvb.10.1668441776588; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:02:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4oB9ddvwbTIryn0kgZXLXywxQaxmg0INKeXSkhyk/GoTxM7Ar+v+mSkg5u2H/M4Gz558VmNg== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:8dcb:0:b0:4c6:51b9:1b3 with SMTP id u11-20020a0c8dcb000000b004c651b901b3mr830224qvb.10.1668441776311; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (adsl-164-85.freeuk.com. [80.168.164.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w11-20020a05620a444b00b006fb72dbbaa4sm2553402qkp.27.2022.11.14.08.02.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:02:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5be45fcc-5e0b-22b8-c0bc-5055b4e50060@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:02:54 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gas: accept custom ".linefile ." To: Jan Beulich Cc: Binutils References: <40e89395-1438-6cbe-aa37-1a04a724c8c7@suse.com> <8587d119-b296-57b5-d99f-d30f3ec7c846@redhat.com> <67e11650-f96f-81c8-7901-98dd47b5e577@suse.com> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: <67e11650-f96f-81c8-7901-98dd47b5e577@suse.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Jan, >> We should document this behaviour in the as.texi file then, so that it >> is "official"... > > Do you really think we should? .linefile as a whole is undocumented. If > people use it, then at their own risk (if we made things "official", > later we couldn't later behavior anymore). Alright - in which case we should document it as being unsupported/not for use. I am just trying to avoid the situation where a future binutils user discovers the directive, tries it out and then complains about it not working as expected/documented/whatever. Cheers Nick