From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36166 invoked by alias); 23 May 2019 13:01:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 36158 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2019 13:01:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:370 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 May 2019 13:01:26 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED0781F25; Thu, 23 May 2019 13:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.0] (unknown [10.36.117.0]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C21247BE81; Thu, 23 May 2019 13:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/9] eBPF support for GNU binutils To: "Jose E. Marchesi" , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20190522152347.21626-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> From: Nick Clifton Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <5e8cc8b7-c29c-6d2c-3f08-16cfeac8b6b1@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 13:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190522152347.21626-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 Hi Jose, The patch series is approved. (Well the binutils parts of it anyway. I see that the other parts have also been approved, so it looks like it is good to go). If you do wish to tweak the bpf entry in the bfd/config.bfd file as I suggested in a previous email then such a change is also approved. Cheers Nick