From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28313 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2016 07:40:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28250 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2016 07:40:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=emails X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:40:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39962C056818; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.5.216] (vpn1-5-216.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.216]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u7J7ejFc014045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Aug 2016 03:40:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fixes / improvements to ARC BFD target support. To: Cupertino Miranda , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20160816155116.23937-1-cmiranda@synopsys.com> Cc: Francois.Bedard@synopsys.com, Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com From: Nick Clifton Message-ID: <60ed9a1c-1c2e-ed3f-c022-d734d60f3a49@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:40:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160816155116.23937-1-cmiranda@synopsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2 Hi Cupertino, > Here are a new set of patches for ARC bfd improvements. > The individual patch emails explain the respective improvement/fix. For future reference, please could you also mention how you tested these changes, and if there were any regressions. Given that there are several different possible configurations for ARC toolchains, it would be good to know that a variety were tested. Cheers Nick