From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12383 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2009 08:18:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 12375 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2009 08:18:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (HELO az33egw02.freescale.net) (192.88.158.103) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:18:33 +0000 Received: from de01smr02.am.mot.com (de01smr02.freescale.net [10.208.0.151]) by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.14.3/az33egw02) with ESMTP id n7S8IUvq024420 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:18:31 -0700 (MST) Received: from zch01exm22.fsl.freescale.net (zch01exm22.ap.freescale.net [10.192.129.206]) by de01smr02.am.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id n7S8Jmop011939 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:19:49 -0500 (CDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: One issue with ld Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6368A20E269B6B4CA5ABB15E14F34C827F3EFD@zch01exm22.fsl.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <20090828080910.GG19523@bubble.grove.modra.org> References: <20090815124234.GA20656@gmx.de> <20090815124327.GB20656@gmx.de> <20090818184815.GF30742@gmx.de> <20090819005839.GF17560@bubble.grove.modra.org> <6368A20E269B6B4CA5ABB15E14F34C827F3786@zch01exm22.fsl.freescale.net> <20090828080111.GF19523@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20090828080910.GG19523@bubble.grove.modra.org> From: "He Yunlong-B20256" To: "Alan Modra" , X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2 Hi, Alan, Thanks very much for your clarification, I saw that bug has got patches, is it fixed or only warned? (Sorry for limited BFD knowledge, so I can't catch up the patch). B.R. Harry -----Original Message----- From: binutils-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:binutils-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Alan Modra Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 4:09 PM To: He Yunlong-B20256; binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: One issue with ld On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:31:11PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:43:42AM +0800, He Yunlong-B20256 wrote: > > We met one issue with powerpc-linux-gnu-ld, which produce different=20 > > program headers from similar ldscript, I submitted one issue > > #10515 and attached sample code and scripts, could you help to have=20 > > a look? >=20 > PHDRS on any but the first PT_LOAD program header isn't currently=20 > supported by GNU ld, sorry. We probably ought to give an error. I meant to say "FILEHDR on any but the first..". It's also quite possible that PHDRS must be on the first PT_LOAD header too. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM