From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=s1VG=M7=klomp.org=mark@sourceware.org>
Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3F63858D28;
	Tue, 28 May 2024 16:16:26 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4D3F63858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4D3F63858D28
Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=45.83.234.184
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1716912987; cv=none;
	b=swCSYPBb2uDXyG0ENp9Nl3wm9NyJKHBl0yDVJCJSrb394Dz+8oCg/wndHQeac8dYIxmhbf5JMpvD0n9sy6fKjeBy8GEs2Qw++Z51V+kjwGntNh2efwU++MWmBJB1Ef9sW6Hgkb1yVfBpqdFOgU3U8/wHuT6xGO0XOOW1T8eKrqE=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
	t=1716912987; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=WHt2t95Es3NkE9pwEK7oKcpYfJw8YkX0/2UptccJa1w=;
	h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=uNl0MzLIGGPg9AY06xqnXau5Cj5L3Zudx/9znyh60qhIuiMoheUkGkSf0NuAq6/hkatxkNi6Pzz8I9p673yBkUrCFsLS8vcM4S2kEFx+sBW20qEYBY4Thms5EZbMzZcV72apuG9FKBjcnwdk8KfUzn0HSHiL0oz25YoT/LRyta4=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
Received: from r6.localdomain (82-217-174-174.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [82.217.174.174])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D9A83021E84;
	Tue, 28 May 2024 18:16:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by r6.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0A5A334033E; Tue, 28 May 2024 18:16:25 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <639e8bc08270ec68074c1bd26295ca5ff12d5faf.camel@klomp.org>
Subject: Re: binutils snapshot builds
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>, "Jose E. Marchesi"
	 <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: buildbot@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org,
 elena.zannoni@oracle.com,  david.faust@oracle.com
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:16:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <45fd21d2-3fec-493e-8495-95acf34f4d86@redhat.com>
References: <20240522221523.458943-1-mark@klomp.org>
	 <87y180mukz.fsf@oracle.com> <20240523234150.GF13045@gnu.wildebeest.org>
	 <8734q7lee7.fsf@oracle.com> <20240526001607.GQ13045@gnu.wildebeest.org>
	 <45fd21d2-3fec-493e-8495-95acf34f4d86@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.1 (3.52.1-1.fc40) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>

Hi Nick,

On Tue, 2024-05-28 at 15:35 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > xz does use a bit more process/memory. It might be nice to use zstd
> > instead. If zstd is common enough of course. What do people think?
>=20
> Does tar automatically understand it ?  ie can I run:
>=20
>    tar xvf <foo>.zst
>=20
> and have it work ?

Yes, it does, since GNU tar 1.31 (released 2019-01-02 - 5 years ago).

Cheers,

Mark