From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22169 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2012 09:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 22156 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2012 09:04:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:04:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2B82900CA; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4dtEKw7ZZsZ1; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2FA2900C7; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Release 2.23: Ping Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:04:00 -0000 Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , binutils Development Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6456FEA4-2ECA-4F4B-BBE9-D20A0972F8D9@adacore.com> References: <2E74490B-BCE6-4D8E-A6F1-737A1625DAA4@adacore.com> <9596AE4D-C319-48C5-89E4-CB5201D9A4DA@adacore.com> To: Matthew Gretton-Dann X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On Sep 5, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > On 5 September 2012 01:56, Maciej W. Rozycki wro= te: >> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: >>=20 >> Here's the resulting list of regressions: >>=20 >> arm-aout +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1 >> arm-aout +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp >> arm-aout +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3 >> arm-aout +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (ARM) >> arm-aout +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb) >> arm-aout +FAIL: Valid v8-a >> arm-coff +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1 >> arm-coff +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp >> arm-coff +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3 >> arm-coff +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb) >> arm-epoc-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1 >> arm-epoc-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp >> arm-epoc-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3 >> arm-epoc-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb) >> arm-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1 >> arm-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp >> arm-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3 >> arm-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb) >> arm-wince-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+cryptov1 >> arm-wince-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+fp >> arm-wince-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-a+simdv3 >> arm-wince-pe +FAIL: Valid v8-A barrier (Thumb) >=20 > I'll take a look at these. >=20 > I don't think they should necessarily hold up the release though as > the EABI targets (arm-none-eabi, arm-none-linux-gnueabi) all pass > these tests for me. Fine. As always, it would be nice to have clean regression output. Thank you for= working to that! OTOH, these regressions look to be aarch64/armv8 specific, so aren't real r= egression compared to 2.22 IIUC. Tristan.