public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Fortune <Matthew.Fortune@imgtec.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
Cc: "binutils@sourceware.org" <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	"Moore, Catherine"	<Catherine_Moore@mentor.com>,
	"macro@codesourcery.com"	<macro@codesourcery.com>,
	"Joseph Myers (joseph@codesourcery.com)"
	<joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv4] Add support for O32 FPXX ABI
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320EB4A44@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fvhnma8u.fsf@talisman.default>

Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com> writes:
> Matthew Fortune <Matthew.Fortune@imgtec.com> writes:
> > @@ -258,6 +258,10 @@ struct mips_set_options
> >       Changed by .set singlefloat or .set doublefloat, command-line
> options
> >       -msingle-float or -mdouble-float.  The default is false.  */
> >    bfd_boolean single_float;
> > +
> > +  /* 1 if single-precision operations on odd-numbered registers are
> > +     not allowed (even if supported by ISA_HAS_ODD_SINGLE_FPR).  */
> > +  int nooddspreg;
> >  };
> 
> I think "oddspreg" would be better, partly for consistency with the
> ISA_HAS_* macro and partly to avoid the double negative in things like:
> 
>   bfd_boolean oddspreg = (ISA_HAS_ODD_SINGLE_FPR (mips_opts.isa,
> mips_opts.arch)
> 			  || FPR_SIZE == 64)
> 			 && !mips_opts.nooddspreg;

OK. There was a reason this worked better as nooddspreg to start with but
it appears long since gone.

> > -  /* Single-precision coprocessor loads and moves are OK too.  */
> > +  /* Single-precision coprocessor loads and moves are OK for 32-bit
> registers,
> > +     otherwise it depends on oddspreg.  */
> >    if ((insn->pinfo & FP_S)
> > -      && (insn->pinfo & (INSN_COPROC_MEMORY_DELAY | INSN_STORE_MEMORY
> > -			 | INSN_LOAD_COPROC_DELAY | INSN_COPROC_MOVE_DELAY)))
> > +      && (insn->pinfo & INSN_FP_32_MOVE))
> > +    return FPR_SIZE == 32 || oddspreg;
> 
> Why do you need a new flag for this?

There are two reasons for this. The lwxc1 instruction is just an
INSN_LOAD_MEMORY. I could however just add that to the list of flags to
check (and remove INSN_COPROC_MEMORY_DELAY if the LOAD is added)... but
the bigger reason is that the micromips mtc1/mfc1 instructions are not
INSN_COPROC_MOVE_DELAY so there is no flag to detect them. This has never
been a problem before as there has always been 32 single precision
registers for micromips but now that may be restricted to 16 depending on
ABI. I could just attach a new flag to the micromips instructions which
lack any other flag but it seems clearer to attach it to the others too.
The only other option is to add INSN_COPROC_MOVE_DELAY to the mtc1/mfc1
instructions in micromips even though that is something of a lie. What do
you think is cleanest?

I would also like to get rid of all the ctc1/cfc1/cttc1/cftc1 instructions
that allow the use of floating point register names: $f0. The problem with
these is that they don't actually write floating point registers but they
will interact with the oddspreg logic as their operands have type
OP_REG_FP. Anything relying on ctc1 $0, $f[0-31] is probably expecting the
wrong thing to happen anyway. If that's OK I'll do a separate patch?

Thanks,
Matthew

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-28 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-25 15:00 Matthew Fortune
2014-07-27  9:17 ` Richard Sandiford
2014-07-28 12:05   ` Matthew Fortune [this message]
2014-07-28 20:56     ` Richard Sandiford
2014-07-28 21:14       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-07-29 10:33       ` Matthew Fortune

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6D39441BF12EF246A7ABCE6654B0235320EB4A44@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org \
    --to=matthew.fortune@imgtec.com \
    --cc=Catherine_Moore@mentor.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).