From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f66.google.com (mail-wm1-f66.google.com [209.85.128.66]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EFF386EC70 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:11:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 28EFF386EC70 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alves.ped@gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-f66.google.com with SMTP id e17so4780971wme.0 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:11:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KdRp3a7KZhH3ui4ShWb09C6NR8o179eOIazfHYddsDU=; b=HF1MNf0qgSH45KvW7slSOGlqBczxWgIxoW85wcWEkPIxpoeBhgUvEtHPuQkVwgujD3 6znVPTu1/yPOFn8O5I1JWvZk58nKjgInzVg596EbqYolSWBdIky2oGPyUK7p0xstZD4s XQhR43lSkbCcrQ4SAlKSgBtyLUnfkIhylk1my3dau8sXhTkOiTA+AwUq0aMOciS30OtM 4gS8B9lzr+X2o7faBK0dPF8dWu23ix3uTX1w9wVDg7jw3vhJBWCTE1qzY7DjQ/VP6cmi zBfNC6C4Y7ti3WNECU/+5o2mDrmg7Hyig3SkG77My2+2GMbUt8kyQOD+DHWwiOO3uoAf lNbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hbYLr6UBM8CTQQYRs/SYs3JpX4bQMy7KKhutHR5zim9TU4Wjz r4aOPYei//k8rsfkpdzuxFAzmiO7mPUejg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySYtIawXcq1JsdynQ1WfT2dd1A63qQq/WGEjFMbMViyOMlJkkCPmJjzBMhj3pWYRPP0YIW8g== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9ec1:: with SMTP id h184mr4915391wme.180.1601388689532; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f905:5600:eefd:c63:53e0:3e8a? ([2001:8a0:f905:5600:eefd:c63:53e0:3e8a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10sm6315800wrn.2.2020.09.29.07.11.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support SHF_GNU_RETAIN ELF section flag To: Michael Matz References: <20200922202933.kgflmtnwzkdrmrvs@jozef-acer-manjaro> <20200928122822.nql5aatbpo7kr5si@jozef-acer-manjaro> <7982913d-90a3-c435-d152-b18f46cad62c@palves.net> <810fbf87-ed6d-9d11-62ba-c92dd75b52b8@palves.net> Cc: binutils@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <6fc41f40-731f-0d4b-9cc6-72a76157633d@palves.net> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:11:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 14:11:32 -0000 On 9/29/20 3:10 PM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 29 Sep 2020, Pedro Alves wrote: > >>> Definitely. But used vs retain attribute seemed like a too detailed >>> distinction to make at this point. For the GCC patches it's totally >>> appropriate, though, as planned. >> >> It's only planned now because I brought it up. I think that shooting >> down a subthread like this implying I'm getting in the way is kind of >> uncalled for, to be honest. > > Apologies, then, sorry. No harm done. Cheers, Pedro Alves