From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80316 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2016 12:37:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 80298 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2016 12:37:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Input, holidays, bank, HX-Envelope-From:sk:thomas. X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:36:59 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0067728; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 05:38:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.206.52] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57D5F3F32C; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 05:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH, binutils, ARM 11/11, ping] Add support for stable secure gateway veneers addresses To: Christophe Lyon References: <005601d13d58$522afb60$f680f220$@foss.arm.com> <1796369.8BmbsroDJA@e108577-lin> <577E5070.3020606@arm.com> <4163700.8nzTNaTl0I@e108577-lin> <378f9855-1f2f-abcc-6030-b077e9b1932e@foss.arm.com> <5b0cd645-7628-705f-3c86-7388513c0708@arm.com> <5f9e12c3-b5b5-1e7d-e319-018a270690e9@foss.arm.com> <0051e9d5-09e6-8bb1-fc15-40693a82fc6f@arm.com> Cc: binutils@sourceware.org From: Thomas Preudhomme Message-ID: <778fe071-0d3d-aa68-0923-aff851b7d656@foss.arm.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 Hi Christophe, On 26/08/16 12:55, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > I've noticed that the new tests fail on armeb. I didn't look at the > detailed logs yet, but I guess you can a look? > > ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Input secure gateway import library > ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Input secure gateway import library: no output import library > ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Input secure gateway import library: earlier stub section base > ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Input secure gateway import library: later stub section base > ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Input secure gateway import library: veneer comeback > ./ld/ld.sum:FAIL: Input secure gateway import library: entry function change I can reproduce indeed. I'll have a look, thanks for the notice. Note that Monday is a bank holidays here so might only answer after that if I'm too slow to find the root cause. Best regards, Thomas