* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
@ 2012-09-17 11:05 Walter Lee
2012-09-17 18:34 ` Walter Lee
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Walter Lee @ 2012-09-17 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gingold; +Cc: binutils
Is it possible to backport the following:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00100.html
This fixes a bug when linking with -relro -now, which is needed to
support glibc.
Thanks,
Walter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* FW: Release 2.23: Ping #2
@ 2012-09-11 6:47 Eggone, NagaJyothi
2012-09-11 9:20 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-18 12:23 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eggone, NagaJyothi @ 2012-09-11 6:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gingold; +Cc: binutils, Ekanathan, Saravanan, Eggone, NagaJyothi
Hi Tristan,
You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
Thanks,
NagaJyothi
Saravanan
-----Original Message-----
From: Eggone, NagaJyothi
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 8:32 PM
To: binutils@sourceware.org
Cc: Ekanathan, Saravanan; Eggone, NagaJyothi
Subject: RE: Release 2.23: Ping #2
Hi Tristan,
Please backport following patches to 2.23 branch:
1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
Regards,
Saravanan
Nagajyothi
-----Original Message-----
From: binutils-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:binutils-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Tristan Gingold
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 2:32 PM
To: binutils Development
Subject: Release 2.23: Ping #2
I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch. If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.
Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release at anytime before Friday.
Thanks,
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-09-11 6:47 FW: " Eggone, NagaJyothi
@ 2012-09-11 9:20 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-13 3:40 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
2012-09-18 12:23 ` Tristan Gingold
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-09-11 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eggone, NagaJyothi; +Cc: binutils, Ekanathan, Saravanan
On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
> 1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
Yes, this patch is still on my list. Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-09-11 9:20 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-09-13 3:40 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
2012-09-13 7:41 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Doug Kwan (關振德) @ 2012-09-13 3:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: Eggone, NagaJyothi, binutils, Ekanathan, Saravanan
Hi Tristan,
Is it okay to include this? I just fixed a bug in the PPC64 backend today.
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00077.html
-Doug
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
>
>> Hi Tristan,
>>
>> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
>> 1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
>> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
>
> Yes, this patch is still on my list. Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.
>
> Tristan.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-09-13 3:40 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
@ 2012-09-13 7:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-13 16:57 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-09-13 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Kwan (關振德)
Cc: Eggone, NagaJyothi, binutils, Ekanathan, Saravanan
On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> Is it okay to include this? I just fixed a bug in the PPC64 backend today.
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00077.html
Yes. Would you do it ?
Tristan.
>
> -Doug
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tristan,
>>>
>>> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
>>> 1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
>>> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
>>
>> Yes, this patch is still on my list. Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.
>>
>> Tristan.
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-09-13 7:41 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-09-13 16:57 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Doug Kwan (關振德) @ 2012-09-13 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: Eggone, NagaJyothi, binutils, Ekanathan, Saravanan
I just checked in the patch.
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00081.html
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:
>
>> Hi Tristan,
>>
>> Is it okay to include this? I just fixed a bug in the PPC64 backend today.
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-09/msg00077.html
>
> Yes. Would you do it ?
>
> Tristan.
>
>>
>> -Doug
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tristan,
>>>>
>>>> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
>>>> 1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
>>>> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
>>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
>>>
>>> Yes, this patch is still on my list. Thank you for providing the binutils-cvs url.
>>>
>>> Tristan.
>>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-09-11 6:47 FW: " Eggone, NagaJyothi
2012-09-11 9:20 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-09-18 12:23 ` Tristan Gingold
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-09-18 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eggone, NagaJyothi; +Cc: binutils, Ekanathan, Saravanan
On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Eggone, NagaJyothi wrote:
> Hi Tristan,
>
> You might have missed this request for backport to 2.23 I made last week. If it is not too late, please backport these two patches to the 2.23 branch. The patches are:
> 1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
> 2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
Now committed on the branch.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* RE: Release 2.23: Ping #2
@ 2012-09-06 15:02 Eggone, NagaJyothi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eggone, NagaJyothi @ 2012-09-06 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils; +Cc: Ekanathan, Saravanan, Eggone, NagaJyothi
Hi Tristan,
Please backport following patches to 2.23 branch:
1)PR14423 fix - http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00075.html
2) Btver1 and Btver2 enablement patch
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2012-08/msg00127.html
Regards,
Saravanan
Nagajyothi
-----Original Message-----
From: binutils-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:binutils-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Tristan Gingold
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 2:32 PM
To: binutils Development
Subject: Release 2.23: Ping #2
I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch. If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.
Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release at anytime before Friday.
Thanks,
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Release 2.23
@ 2012-07-23 12:41 Tristan Gingold
2012-07-31 20:30 ` Matthias Klose
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-07-23 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils Development
Hi,
I was rather busy before the summer and hence I didn't take the time to create a 2.22.1 release.
I can however schedule a release for this summer. So my plan is:
* I will create the 2.23 branch this week and creating a pre-release just after.
* I plan to do the 2.23 release at the end of August or at the beginning of September (unless there is a blocking issue).
So, if you have big or large changes, it would be nice to wait a little bit. And as usual, do not hesitate to test your favourite platforms.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23
2012-07-23 12:41 Release 2.23 Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-07-31 20:30 ` Matthias Klose
2012-08-01 13:59 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Klose @ 2012-07-31 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils Development, Richard Earnshaw
On 23.07.2012 14:40, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was rather busy before the summer and hence I didn't take the time to create a 2.22.1 release.
> I can however schedule a release for this summer. So my plan is:
>
> * I will create the 2.23 branch this week and creating a pre-release just after.
>
> * I plan to do the 2.23 release at the end of August or at the beginning of September (unless there is a blocking issue).
>
> So, if you have big or large changes, it would be nice to wait a little bit. And as usual, do not hesitate to test your favourite platforms.
what are the chances to get the recently submitted aarch64 target backported to
the branch once it is accepted for the trunk?
Matthias
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23
2012-07-31 20:30 ` Matthias Klose
@ 2012-08-01 13:59 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-08-01 14:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-08-01 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthias Klose, Nick Clifton, Richard Earnshaw
Cc: binutils Development, Richard Earnshaw
On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 23.07.2012 14:40, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was rather busy before the summer and hence I didn't take the time to create a 2.22.1 release.
>> I can however schedule a release for this summer. So my plan is:
>>
>> * I will create the 2.23 branch this week and creating a pre-release just after.
>>
>> * I plan to do the 2.23 release at the end of August or at the beginning of September (unless there is a blocking issue).
>>
>> So, if you have big or large changes, it would be nice to wait a little bit. And as usual, do not hesitate to test your favourite platforms.
>
> what are the chances to get the recently submitted aarch64 target backported to
> the branch once it is accepted for the trunk?
Looks like some of you would like to have aarch64 in 2.23.
As it might change the schedule, I'd like to understand the reasons for having aarch64 in 2.23
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23
2012-08-01 13:59 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-08-01 14:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-08-01 14:35 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2012-08-01 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: Matthias Klose, nickc, binutils Development
On 01/08/12 14:58, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 10:28 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 23.07.2012 14:40, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was rather busy before the summer and hence I didn't take the time to create a 2.22.1 release.
>>> I can however schedule a release for this summer. So my plan is:
>>>
>>> * I will create the 2.23 branch this week and creating a pre-release just after.
>>>
>>> * I plan to do the 2.23 release at the end of August or at the beginning of September (unless there is a blocking issue).
>>>
>>> So, if you have big or large changes, it would be nice to wait a little bit. And as usual, do not hesitate to test your favourite platforms.
>>
>> what are the chances to get the recently submitted aarch64 target backported to
>> the branch once it is accepted for the trunk?
>
> Looks like some of you would like to have aarch64 in 2.23.
> As it might change the schedule, I'd like to understand the reasons for having aarch64 in 2.23
>
> Tristan.
>
Because binutils is a key enabler and rolling this out into various
distros is significantly harder if it isn't in a major release. In
particular we're targetting GCC-4.8 for the main compiler support and
that needs a binutils that supports it.
Why are we planning a binutils release so much earlier this year than we
have done for the previous 3 or 4 years (at least)?
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23
2012-08-01 14:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
@ 2012-08-01 14:35 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-08-01 14:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-08-01 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Earnshaw; +Cc: Matthias Klose, nickc, binutils Development
On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> As it might change the schedule, I'd like to understand the reasons for having aarch64 in 2.23
> Because binutils is a key enabler and rolling this out into various
> distros is significantly harder if it isn't in a major release. In
> particular we're targetting GCC-4.8 for the main compiler support and
> that needs a binutils that supports it.
Looks like a good rational, but this opens other possibilities:
* would it be acceptable to add aarch64 only in 2.23.1 (in case the submission takes time) ?
* if aarch64 comes only with 2.24, what would be the ideal schedule for the release ?
> Why are we planning a binutils release so much earlier this year than we
> have done for the previous 3 or 4 years (at least)?
I plan a release when the trunk is relatively quiet and when I have enough time for it.
Traditionally, the major release is planed for end of summer but we often slip a while :-)
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23
2012-08-01 14:35 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-08-01 14:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-08-02 11:41 ` Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2012-08-01 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: Matthias Klose, nickc, binutils Development
On 01/08/12 15:35, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>> As it might change the schedule, I'd like to understand the reasons for having aarch64 in 2.23
>
>> Because binutils is a key enabler and rolling this out into various
>> distros is significantly harder if it isn't in a major release. In
>> particular we're targetting GCC-4.8 for the main compiler support and
>> that needs a binutils that supports it.
>
> Looks like a good rational, but this opens other possibilities:
>
> * would it be acceptable to add aarch64 only in 2.23.1 (in case the submission takes time) ?
Perhaps, if we can guarantee that it's timely enough.
>
> * if aarch64 comes only with 2.24, what would be the ideal schedule for the release ?
>
November :-)
>> Why are we planning a binutils release so much earlier this year than we
>> have done for the previous 3 or 4 years (at least)?
>
> I plan a release when the trunk is relatively quiet and when I have enough time for it.
>
> Traditionally, the major release is planed for end of summer but we often slip a while :-)
So why not this time? ;-)
Looking at the review feedback so far, there's very little that we
wouldn't expect to address before the end of August.
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23
2012-08-01 14:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
@ 2012-08-02 11:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-08-31 14:40 ` Release 2.23: Ping Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-08-02 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Earnshaw; +Cc: Matthias Klose, nickc, binutils Development
On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:39 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> Looking at the review feedback so far, there's very little that we
> wouldn't expect to address before the end of August.
Great. So I still plan the 2.23 release for end of August. If aarch64 can go in the trunk before end of August, please backport it to the release branch. Otherwise, we will review the release plan.
I will be away until August 20, so I let maintainer decide wether any backport is appropriate or not.
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Release 2.23: Ping
2012-08-02 11:41 ` Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-08-31 14:40 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-05 9:02 ` Release 2.23: Ping #2 Tristan Gingold
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-08-31 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils Development
Hi,
as far as I understand, aarch64 was committed in the 2.23 branch. I'd like to thanks for doing this timely.
Is there any patch that need to be in the 2.23 release ? Please, reply quickly as I'd like to do the release soon.
Thanks in advance,
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-08-31 14:40 ` Release 2.23: Ping Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-09-05 9:02 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-07 3:14 ` Alan Modra
2012-09-09 17:05 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Tristan Gingold @ 2012-09-05 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils Development
I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch. If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.
Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release at anytime before Friday.
Thanks,
Tristan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-09-05 9:02 ` Release 2.23: Ping #2 Tristan Gingold
@ 2012-09-07 3:14 ` Alan Modra
2012-09-09 17:05 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alan Modra @ 2012-09-07 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils Development
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:01:49AM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> I think all the patches that were requested have been backported to the 2.23 branch. If I missed a patch, please tell me ASAP.
> If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.
I decided to put my pr14464 fix for ppc64 onto the branch. It's one
of those bugs that probably doesn't affect too many people so I hadn't
bothered to commit the fix there. OTOH, the fix ought to be quite
safe. If you have already begun the release process, I'm not fussed
if this fix didn't make it into the release.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: Release 2.23: Ping #2
2012-09-05 9:02 ` Release 2.23: Ping #2 Tristan Gingold
2012-09-07 3:14 ` Alan Modra
@ 2012-09-09 17:05 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson @ 2012-09-09 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tristan Gingold; +Cc: binutils Development
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> If you have a new backport request, please tell us ASAP too.
In <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00101.html> I
mentioned
<http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-09/msg00008.html> but
got the description wrong; that was for a SEGV on a .section
directive. The "FAIL: gas/mmix/fb-2" patch is in
<http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-08/msg00243.html>.
Ok for 2.23?
> Ideally, I'd like to be in a state where I can do the release
> at anytime before Friday.
Oops. But it hasn't happened yet AFAICT, so here we go.
brgds, H-P
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-09-18 12:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-09-17 11:05 Release 2.23: Ping #2 Walter Lee
2012-09-17 18:34 ` Walter Lee
2012-09-18 12:27 ` Tristan Gingold
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-11 6:47 FW: " Eggone, NagaJyothi
2012-09-11 9:20 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-13 3:40 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
2012-09-13 7:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-13 16:57 ` Doug Kwan (關振德)
2012-09-18 12:23 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-09-06 15:02 Eggone, NagaJyothi
2012-07-23 12:41 Release 2.23 Tristan Gingold
2012-07-31 20:30 ` Matthias Klose
2012-08-01 13:59 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-08-01 14:03 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-08-01 14:35 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-08-01 14:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-08-02 11:41 ` Tristan Gingold
2012-08-31 14:40 ` Release 2.23: Ping Tristan Gingold
2012-09-05 9:02 ` Release 2.23: Ping #2 Tristan Gingold
2012-09-07 3:14 ` Alan Modra
2012-09-09 17:05 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).