From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CDD73858C66 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:43:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5CDD73858C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673530999; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nObX6A8gs07Igcg6LiC+zuMgMy3cgnFgZg0pD9n/9ZY=; b=U5hNnC72MHn8HSWNQE/Z8c0cmHU7yOLxf4hV4GeMaESeIYAqOWImkbC5sAftHQbIX90OcA 4Asp6XJL+SGmbT2txHKP8XKrG0sG82ElhVAylNyQrBCg5ABc4vi+bCW2n4pCKCNYmSOv/V NLjTyWOJaP9ndgSDAbvb6g6N6jLd6kY= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-502-XmbagYpRMVinM-pnMx2pag-1; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:43:18 -0500 X-MC-Unique: XmbagYpRMVinM-pnMx2pag-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id c66-20020a1c3545000000b003d355c13229so12506442wma.0 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 05:43:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nObX6A8gs07Igcg6LiC+zuMgMy3cgnFgZg0pD9n/9ZY=; b=BDcWLBowgCM91HajrrUvC8f6A1aCPGZ/7l4MuJOJsbrw4Oauw4lR8JKz0fGsLnFOjp 2Ncbz/3rLJ63J4rxclrhWMrObQPuAlL7ftvwZ8QG+9h4TNKvIfbvJAlOb8xJyOOejrAN XrFxfVwZSVNCCChNujOrShUbKMpu11HA5xWE4jPGBdWGcR+DuQbTyNnqtazcKH/2mNWl ag6YygCbNJb9DX2w4yViYg2vnGWNU8dl86VgvWiMwGI1sl0asYMwP/gxlVFvLW3XoTqs 8qZPeEQn+xvEZ+L0Ws5/YFlxMNnJxQ9VBiYqu9OSmCpd9P1j97XFfNJK/CRMVnplxsz6 KcBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kocEcXoplz+oSZlKayeRU4+jMeHTcFpg6n3wBYzyJMOLNmr5UMs 9K+5t4lSNnuxjoSnfaxjUocoB0waqB2aen9o1nmDL6uJVzVkjtpxqyG+BubCPgXK1EZQ7EBHUS4 14t1Lky+qVRmHtdiCzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7c14:0:b0:3d1:f74d:4f60 with SMTP id x20-20020a1c7c14000000b003d1f74d4f60mr59162990wmc.22.1673530997352; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 05:43:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtS6yBlnTSWc40E1hV279OAPVQStG2lLAH0g9KrqT19pnFMwpAqqpbta0z9olw3IhwoEyUsvQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7c14:0:b0:3d1:f74d:4f60 with SMTP id x20-20020a1c7c14000000b003d1f74d4f60mr59162976wmc.22.1673530997095; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 05:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([79.123.71.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r5-20020a05600c35c500b003d98f92692fsm24198624wmq.17.2023.01.12.05.43.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jan 2023 05:43:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7c1372ff-47c4-5e4e-cc16-73a300078de1@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:43:15 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.40 v2 3/3] libctf: ctf-link outdated input check faulty To: Nick Alcock , binutils@sourceware.org References: <20230110130050.366404-1-nick.alcock@oracle.com> <20230110130050.366404-4-nick.alcock@oracle.com> <87r0w1oulw.fsf_-_@esperi.org.uk> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: <87r0w1oulw.fsf_-_@esperi.org.uk> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Nick, > Is this patch alone OK for 2.40? It is - but please do this today if you can - I am planning on creating the release tarballs tomorrow... > (After I push this series to master. > Tomorrow, not today... all tests passed, crash on i686-pc-linux-gnu > fixed, valgrind-clean, asan-clean.) > > (I plan to backport it all the way back to 2.36.) Have fun! Cheers Nick