public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, dj@redhat.com,
	ktietz70@googlemail.com, binutils@sourceware.org,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83lj0opgav.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103091258.38655.pedro@codesourcery.com>

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:58:38 +0000
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>  dj@redhat.com,
>  ktietz70@googlemail.com,
>  binutils@sourceware.org,
>  gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> 
> > > The one's left are: 1 in a linux-native only file (never cares
> > > for other filesystem semantics), and a couple in the coff and
> > > mdebug readers.  The latter could be rewritten in terms of
> > > lbasename, but I'm not sure whether gcc outputs a literal '/' in
> > > that case even when building on mingw.  If so, and we changed them,
> > > we'd be breaking reading these files on Windows
> > 
> > Sorry, I don't understand how would that break on Windows.  Could you
> > elaborate?  And what "couple of coff and mdebug readers" did you have
> > in mind?
> 
> Sorry, in the hurry, I had a (another) brain cramp.  Wouldn't break.
> Still it'd be useless to change this _if_ gcc hardcodes '/'.  Dunno
> whether it does.

At least on MinGW, GCC simply uses whatever was passed on the command
line.  I tested that by compiling the same source file, passing it to
GCC with different flavors of slashes, including mixed ones.  Then in
GDB I typed "info sources" and saw the source file with exactly the
same flavor of slashes as what I typed on the GCC command line.

Funnily enough, when the file name given to GCC includes at least one
backslash, "info sources" shows the same file twice, like this:

  (gdb) info sources
  Source files for which symbols have been read in:



  Source files for which symbols will be read in on demand:

  d:/usr/eli/data/dbw.c, d:\usr\eli/data\dbw.c

This is with GDB 7.2 and GCC 3.4.2.  That means we compare files with
strcmp/strcasecmp somewhere, and don't know that / and \ are
equivalent here.  Or maybe it's a bug in the ancient version of GCC I
use.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-09 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-08 10:56 Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 11:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 11:25   ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 11:53     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 12:01       ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 12:43         ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 12:48           ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 13:33             ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 13:37               ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 18:39               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 18:50                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-08 18:51                 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 19:54                   ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found] ` <E1Pwupb-0001ns-M8__47566.5626036518$1299582745$gmane$org@fencepost.gnu.org>
2011-03-08 11:55   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-03-08 15:11 ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 15:30   ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-08 18:37     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 19:41       ` DJ Delorie
2011-03-08 19:59         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-08 22:38         ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09  5:29           ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-09 11:46             ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 12:35               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-03-09 12:58                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 13:36                   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-03-12 16:40                     ` Kai Tietz
2011-03-09 14:37                   ` Build regression [Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching] Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-09 15:02                     ` Pedro Alves
2011-03-09 15:08                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-12 16:44         ` [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching Kai Tietz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83lj0opgav.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).