From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492C138582BF; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:38:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 492C138582BF Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oL224-0006Rm-G3; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 08:38:56 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1476 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oL223-0000ex-Va; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 08:38:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:38:42 +0300 Message-Id: <83wnbivrjh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Luis Machado Cc: simark@simark.ca, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Luis Machado on Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:04:58 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable year 2038 support on 32-bit hosts by default References: <20220801075149.1152064-1-luis.machado@arm.com> <959a19b9-b2c3-6638-e0b9-b66ca8328574@simark.ca> <4224183e-e2c1-9a98-7e41-61a58e49aa29@arm.com> <14374ca2-3979-f2d2-2296-a36ba9c615d2@simark.ca> <834jyw2bwd.fsf@gnu.org> <83e592ff-fa28-ddfb-a46d-79db726d2b5e@arm.com> <83zggfuets.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:39:00 -0000 > Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:04:58 +0100 > Cc: simark@simark.ca, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, binutils@sourceware.org, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Luis Machado > > >> Any additional thoughts on this one? > > > > What is the current plan if no one else chimes in? > > I'd like to push this temporary fix in so we can at least have a functional 32-bit Arm GDB on 32-bit hosts supporting > 64-bit time_t. I expect other 32-bit GDB's will also potentially run into this. I don't object to that. Thanks.