From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eliz@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323873856DCB;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2022 16:29:26 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 323873856DCB
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42156)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oLS6e-0004IY-Ga; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:29:24 -0400
Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1060 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1oLS6d-0001j0-Vu; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 12:29:24 -0400
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 19:29:13 +0300
Message-Id: <83y1vxtm7a.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: luis.machado@arm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
 binutils@sourceware.org, simark@simark.ca
In-Reply-To: <126b860d-0c2c-9fab-a87b-7b97df5ee034@cs.ucla.edu> (message from
 Paul Eggert on Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:49:53 -0700)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable year 2038 support on 32-bit hosts by default
References: <20220801075149.1152064-1-luis.machado@arm.com>
 <959a19b9-b2c3-6638-e0b9-b66ca8328574@simark.ca>
 <4224183e-e2c1-9a98-7e41-61a58e49aa29@arm.com>
 <14374ca2-3979-f2d2-2296-a36ba9c615d2@simark.ca> <834jyw2bwd.fsf@gnu.org>
 <83e592ff-fa28-ddfb-a46d-79db726d2b5e@arm.com>
 <2958d426-aece-4597-1a6d-ec0981ebb1a6@cs.ucla.edu>
 <fd40b312-d45d-4cff-37c0-82bf63bc716c@arm.com>
 <26aee793-5d5a-62c7-38ee-e133db897984@arm.com>
 <126b860d-0c2c-9fab-a87b-7b97df5ee034@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF,
 RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Binutils mailing list <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/binutils>,
 <mailto:binutils-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/binutils>,
 <mailto:binutils-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:29:27 -0000

> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:49:53 -0700
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org,
>  Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> 
> PPS. I couldn't get a 32-bit version of binutils-gdb to build on Fedora 
> x86-64, even without either of the attached patches.

FTR, I regularly do such builds (on native MS-Windows), both the parts
used by GDB when I build GDB, and when I build Binutils themselves.  I
never had any trouble (with the caveat that I didn't yet build the
latest Binutils 3.29).