From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
Cc: hjl@lucon.org, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: The old libiberty/cplus-dem.c? 
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 13:19:00 -0000
Message-id: <8603.935956667@upchuck.cygnus.com>
References: <19990829194121.3918.qmail@daffy.airs.com>
X-SW-Source: 1999-08/msg00178.html

  In message < 19990829194121.3918.qmail@daffy.airs.com >you write:
  >    Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
  >    From: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu)
  > 
  >    libiberty/cplus-dem.c in binutils seems older than the one in gcc
  >    2.95.1. Are them from thes same source?
  > 
  > They are conceptually the same, but as a matter of practice the
  > binutils CVS repository is completely distinct from the gcc CVS
  > repository.
  > 
  > Perhaps we should make a practice of importing the binutils libiberty
  > directory from the gcc one.
One of the other approaches would be to have a unified CVS repository across
the projects -- I've been kicking the idea around with the gdb folks recently
to get their initial impressions of the idea.

Any thoughts Ian?

jeff