From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: pedwards@disaster.jaj.com
Cc: dj@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: libiberty docs are in
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:54:00 -0000
Message-id: <8632-Thu27Sep2001225436+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <200109261856.f8QIuO414025@greed.delorie.com> <1659-Thu27Sep2001121904+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <20010927150200.G6776@disaster.jaj.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00483.html

> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 15:02:00 -0400
> From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
> 
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 12:19:05PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > [Repeat after me: "it's ``occurrence'', not ``occurance'' ;-)  May I
> > suggest "M-x ispell-comments-and-strings RET"?]
> 
> Certainly you may, but it won't cause me to start using Emacs...
> 
> I take responsibilty for the original state of comments, and I wasn't
> about to try and run a texinfo file through any of the spell checkers I had
> available to me at the time.

The latest version of Ispell comes with a deformatter program that
strips everything except comments and strings from a C source.  So you
could use Ispell as a stand-alone speller, if you don't want Emacs.