From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com (aserp2120.oracle.com [141.146.126.78]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE1073857C5C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org EE1073857C5C Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08F9mvlS091500; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:10 GMT Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33gp9m3y4w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:10 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08F9nnsf060637; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:09 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33hm304g8h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:09 +0000 Received: from abhmp0006.oracle.com (abhmp0006.oracle.com [141.146.116.12]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 08FAB8O4029997; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:08 GMT Received: from termi.oracle.com (/10.175.14.173) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:08 +0000 From: "Jose E. Marchesi" To: Nick Clifton via Binutils Cc: Mark Wielaard , Nick Clifton Subject: Re: Should we have a 2.35.1 point release ? References: <2eb8cd4e-45d6-01e0-96c3-9bf4a7098c51@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:11:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2eb8cd4e-45d6-01e0-96c3-9bf4a7098c51@redhat.com> (Nick Clifton via Binutils's message of "Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:57:26 +0100") Message-ID: <87363j73k7.fsf@oracle.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9744 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=886 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009150088 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9744 signatures=668679 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=901 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009150088 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:11:15 -0000 > Hi Guys, > > With all the recent fixes that have gone in to the 2.35 branch, I > was wondering whether it would be a reasonable to have a 2.35.1 > point release. > > What do you think ? > > If we are agreed then I would probably carve it out over this weekend > (Sep 19/20). +1