* PATCH: PR binutils/12639: nm/readelf failed to detect corrupted symbol table
@ 2013-11-05 18:19 H.J. Lu
2013-11-06 18:17 ` Richard Sandiford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2013-11-05 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: binutils
Hi,
Some tools may generate corrupted symbol table such that global symbols
are treated as local. Linker will complain undefined symbols while
outputs from nm/readelf show the symbols are defined and global. This
patch adds corrupted symbol table check to nm/readelf. OK to install?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
bfd/
2013-11-05 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR binutils/12639
* elfcode.h (elf_slurp_symbol_table): Check corrupted global
symbols.
binutils/
2013-11-05 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
PR binutils/12639
* readelf.c (process_symbol_table): Detect corrupted symbol
table.
diff --git a/bfd/elfcode.h b/bfd/elfcode.h
index e296c5c..cf45c27 100644
--- a/bfd/elfcode.h
+++ b/bfd/elfcode.h
@@ -1168,6 +1168,9 @@ elf_slurp_symbol_table (bfd *abfd, asymbol **symptrs, bfd_boolean dynamic)
sym = symbase = NULL;
else
{
+ /* Start of global symbols */
+ Elf_Internal_Sym *start_global;
+
isymbuf = bfd_elf_get_elf_syms (abfd, hdr, symcount, 0,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
if (isymbuf == NULL)
@@ -1212,6 +1215,9 @@ elf_slurp_symbol_table (bfd *abfd, asymbol **symptrs, bfd_boolean dynamic)
if (xver != NULL)
++xver;
isymend = isymbuf + symcount;
+ start_global = isymbuf;
+ if (!elf_bad_symtab (abfd))
+ start_global += hdr->sh_info;
for (isym = isymbuf + 1, sym = symbase; isym < isymend; isym++, sym++)
{
memcpy (&sym->internal_elf_sym, isym, sizeof (Elf_Internal_Sym));
@@ -1270,6 +1276,12 @@ elf_slurp_symbol_table (bfd *abfd, asymbol **symptrs, bfd_boolean dynamic)
if ((abfd->flags & (EXEC_P | DYNAMIC)) != 0)
sym->symbol.value -= sym->symbol.section->vma;
+ if (isym < start_global
+ && ELF_ST_BIND (isym->st_info) != STB_LOCAL)
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("%s: corrupted global symbol `%s' treated as local"),
+ abfd->filename, sym->symbol.name);
+
switch (ELF_ST_BIND (isym->st_info))
{
case STB_LOCAL:
diff --git a/binutils/readelf.c b/binutils/readelf.c
index 0389f14..9ae5b5d 100644
--- a/binutils/readelf.c
+++ b/binutils/readelf.c
@@ -9607,6 +9607,12 @@ process_symbol_table (FILE * file)
else if (do_dyn_syms || (do_syms && !do_using_dynamic))
{
unsigned int i;
+ /* Irix 5 and 6 are broken. Object file symbol tables are not
+ always sorted correctly such that local symbols precede global
+ symbols, and the sh_info field in the symbol table is not
+ always right. */
+ bfd_boolean check_corrupt_symtab
+ = elf_header.e_ident[EI_OSABI] != ELFOSABI_IRIX;
for (i = 0, section = section_headers;
i < elf_header.e_shnum;
@@ -9669,7 +9675,12 @@ process_symbol_table (FILE * file)
putchar (' ');
print_vma (psym->st_size, DEC_5);
printf (" %-7s", get_symbol_type (ELF_ST_TYPE (psym->st_info)));
- printf (" %-6s", get_symbol_binding (ELF_ST_BIND (psym->st_info)));
+ if (check_corrupt_symtab
+ && si < section->sh_info
+ && ELF_ST_BIND (psym->st_info) != STB_LOCAL)
+ printf (" %-6s", "<corrupt>");
+ else
+ printf (" %-6s", get_symbol_binding (ELF_ST_BIND (psym->st_info)));
printf (" %-7s", get_symbol_visibility (ELF_ST_VISIBILITY (psym->st_other)));
/* Check to see if any other bits in the st_other field are set.
Note - displaying this information disrupts the layout of the
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: PATCH: PR binutils/12639: nm/readelf failed to detect corrupted symbol table
2013-11-05 18:19 PATCH: PR binutils/12639: nm/readelf failed to detect corrupted symbol table H.J. Lu
@ 2013-11-06 18:17 ` Richard Sandiford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Sandiford @ 2013-11-06 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H.J. Lu; +Cc: binutils
"H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> writes:
> Some tools may generate corrupted symbol table such that global symbols
> are treated as local. Linker will complain undefined symbols while
> outputs from nm/readelf show the symbols are defined and global. This
> patch adds corrupted symbol table check to nm/readelf. OK to install?
Hmm, what was the outcome of:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-04/msg00088.html
which seemed to be the last word on the original patch? FWIW I agree
that printing "<corrupt>" instead of the binding would be confusing.
You said:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-04/msg00100.html
but we could be more helpful than "Bad symtab". E.g.:
Symbol %d is in the local area but is not STB_LOCAL
Or if you wanted to get really fancy you could stick a [*] at
the end of the line and say something like:
[*] These symbols are in the local area but are not STB_LOCAL
at the end (all text just examples).
[BTW, sorry for butting in, but the MIPS reference caught my eye...]
Thanks,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-06 18:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-05 18:19 PATCH: PR binutils/12639: nm/readelf failed to detect corrupted symbol table H.J. Lu
2013-11-06 18:17 ` Richard Sandiford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).