From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6193858D37 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 23:08:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7F6193858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cmgw12.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.127]) by progateway5.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28031004B4E9 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 23:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id YEWEpYXL7C4qIYEWEpbxhf; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 23:08:54 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Jcx5EWGV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=64027e06 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=k__wU0fu6RkA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=iox4zFpeAAAA:8 a=JB60b_eE9y1tdMKPWKAA:9 a=WzC6qhA0u3u7Ye7llzcV:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GBSUkLMdqh1RzrWjuQYB1fSTStK/iWMQKoa6Tcc3VAU=; b=Isl/sGv9qTjJAH5VeoLaCq/qTD 8X6XNM1U9nWsa2GXCa+cwQtg3hKcMpVy9DYzfzY1rkVkAZpLcCHngEOfXevRs3FL47Nze/dFsMT6f s0i1jEG6gCB2HfFrvw3ggasbC; Received: from 75-166-130-93.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.130.93]:49640 helo=prentzel) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pYEWE-0035HL-I8; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 16:08:54 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Beulich Cc: Tom Tromey , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Simplify @node use in BFD documentation References: <20230208071725.3668898-1-tom@tromey.com> <20230208071725.3668898-3-tom@tromey.com> <8392b8ac-2447-2721-706b-aae4c3021404@suse.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 16:08:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8392b8ac-2447-2721-706b-aae4c3021404@suse.com> (Jan Beulich's message of "Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:20:15 +0100") Message-ID: <874jr1l9fh.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 75.166.130.93 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1pYEWE-0035HL-I8 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 75-166-130-93.hlrn.qwest.net (prentzel) [75.166.130.93]:49640 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3020.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Beulich writes: Jan> Does this change need to be accompanied by an update to configure, to Jan> build BFD doc only with new enough makeinfo? This is what I get with Jan> 4.12 (admittedly old, but apparently deemed acceptable right now): I had no idea anyone was using a 10 year old makeinfo. Does that work for gdb's docs? Or gcc's? Jan> .../bfd/doc/bfd.texi:245: Node `Sections' requires a sectioning command (e.g., @unnumberedsubsec). I guess that old version uses the full @node form as a workaround for the lack of sectioning in bfd.texi. If binutils wants to support this then I think backing it out is probably the way to go. Tom