From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E3943858D33 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:34:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1E3943858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675157665; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fZ5k4zKupKqxneWVstbsfSjTVqyDvXT9nXxZnuvv40U=; b=KAorhUxbQCCYqvbUNt+5O/XckyvDiyYS/uNQ6h8j68lDCcPzXa8je04HkPid2UwjeZ8RVh Is0sUdwKScceIzflQeoGHyv8JaKLK/OOVscRSk/tJ8UERDdgPtVw7dHznPuxwiHb1D/Blz 89DXM6cu10Pvm5nX/UcwQXttLChoenE= Received: from mail-qv1-f71.google.com (mail-qv1-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-35-3HSteuGINkek6g9CVBR8pQ-1; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 04:34:21 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 3HSteuGINkek6g9CVBR8pQ-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f71.google.com with SMTP id jo26-20020a056214501a00b0053aa15f61d4so4133791qvb.7 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:34:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fZ5k4zKupKqxneWVstbsfSjTVqyDvXT9nXxZnuvv40U=; b=oyJrNuAihtBdtsTA5r7I7nPZEGxMAeQwnPntTw1LDf/8THbGoARjlFgPWJuDmAch5x eOB8icFEJWSI0fM2qaMtSlp56ELh/x9axNW6Hnu5fE+Ng3t8J4Y7hpsyf9v9ohL+/3xq 6IUykqkQv2ELQs0loNHHhDBB4rpiQ9xp6kB86/85KdnhmogT5qgQEzLXhvF9eesHvlCd 5yiL3QDBYr9ZoGAsYOq0P+nKqivBrkcWzDsg+BYSkohrQ0x4Ubq7uWPe1JSQeEOY0i/l JIIYjN9eoyqnhe5E1z14eygldNN0yoKaDToSXI4OK2pA5nta7+86DUJ6/ZQSisxNPjyG 3CEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW8M18UwPpEHqir2GVqzQbSDpOpXKB1bFUaDFLu3qCzAUQvFY3f ygid1xazPnK4u2rNJ7GRDnzw4YWxAESDnGS4xw8wJ1MhLyjOBuiSEJTT87buQ1+Qh/IsrVkF6nh NhTAbntfV9AlJeHVNfA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:394:b0:3b8:296b:21ec with SMTP id j20-20020a05622a039400b003b8296b21ecmr25063582qtx.65.1675157660853; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:34:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/Tw9qHwMEuu27vLGOgvGUODTtTqj4JcOYl7GFrC4mghHvbuWx7rBQDQbLgZk2yWMF4egP7sw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:394:b0:3b8:296b:21ec with SMTP id j20-20020a05622a039400b003b8296b21ecmr25063559qtx.65.1675157660555; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:34:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (95.72.115.87.dyn.plus.net. [87.115.72.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i1-20020a37b801000000b00702d1c6e7bbsm9509040qkf.130.2023.01.31.01.34.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Jan 2023 01:34:20 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Burgess To: Alan Modra Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gas/ppc: Additional tests for DFP instructions In-Reply-To: References: <95d700d49f5cdd2239c44ec17dadd11652f7be93.1675091147.git.aburgess@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 09:34:18 +0000 Message-ID: <874js7ujxh.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Alan Modra writes: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 03:11:41PM +0000, Andrew Burgess via Binutils wrote: >> I noticed that some of the Power6 DFP instructions were not covered by >> the assembler tests. I've added a new test file which I believe >> covers all the DFP Power6 instructions. >> >> The existing gas/testsuite/gas/ppc/power6.d test is called: >> >> POWER6 tests (includes DFP and Altivec) >> >> And does cover some of the DFP instructions. But, given the number of >> additional instructions I'm adding I opted to add a whole new test >> file. I've left the original power6.d unchanged, so there is now some >> overlap, but I don't think that should hurt much. > > Thanks for doing this. Please apply. Pushed. Thanks, Andrew