From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A163857C5A for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 02:55:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 94A163857C5A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org References: <20230808012403.1650515-1-sam@gentoo.org> <8875a6b2-30e5-89ce-cba8-88498683bd9b@suse.com> <871qgdto5m.fsf@gentoo.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.4; emacs 30.0.50 From: Sam James To: Jan Beulich Cc: Sam James , binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ld: Fix relocatable.d XFAIL/notarget entry for hppa Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 03:55:33 +0100 Organization: Gentoo In-reply-to: Message-ID: <877cq37gi8.fsf@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Jan Beulich writes: > On 08.08.2023 19:53, Sam James wrote: >> >> Jan Beulich writes: >> >>> On 08.08.2023 03:23, Sam James via Binutils wrote: >>>> PR 30734 >>>> * ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.d: Fix notarget entry for hppa to match >>>> hppa{1.1,2.0}*, like hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu which Gentoo uses. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sam James >>> >>> Since the two patches deal with the only two outliers, I'd consider these >>> to be at least very close to obvious. Feel free to put in. Yet in the >>> future for arch-specific changes please remember to Cc respective arch >>> maintainers. >> >> 1. ACK, pushed. Thank you. Sorry, I was a bit too conservative here. >> 2. Fair point, I will do this in future. >> >> What's the rule for backports? Can I just do those if obvious? > > Unless while the tree is closed, I'd say generally yes, but after waiting > a little (to see whether there's fallout nevertheless, as appears to be > the case here). Of course it also doesn't hurt asking. > >> What >> about if they're not my commits but I've tested them and they're >> straightforward? > > I'm less sure here - I, for one, would ask in such a case, despite (now) > being global maintainer. Thank you for the advice Jan!