From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [IPv6:2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919273858292 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:15:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 919273858292 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LPYKP0ZX5z1s7sp; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:15:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LPYKP0FMRz1qqkC; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:15:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ncOVtdAqv2eJ; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:15:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: 8ALGXVBV4TsKPlE7cn5NBve38+up2N8H1VdkwiIupTdGYwfUKwcS+Rf2sP7kDI6I Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-163-102.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.163.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:15:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDFD22C354F; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:14:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Dmitry Selyutin via Binutils Cc: Dmitry Selyutin , Luke Leighton Subject: Re: Are big tests allowed in binutils? References: X-Yow: How many retired bricklayers from FLORIDA are out purchasing PENCIL SHARPENERS right NOW?? Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:14:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Selyutin via Binutils's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2022 08:11:12 +0300") Message-ID: <878rpvslbm.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:15:09 -0000 On Jun 17 2022, Dmitry Selyutin via Binutils wrote: > For example, the assembly listing for a new > svremap instruction takes 10240 lines, and etalon dump takes a bit > more lines. So, questions: > 1. Is it OK at all to have tests that large? Time-wise they're fast, The biggest test so far is gas/testsuite/gas/tic54x/all-opcodes.s, with 124668 lines. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."