From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 716 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2004 02:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 361 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2004 02:56:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2004 02:56:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 27705 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2004 02:56:03 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO taltos.codesourcery.com) (zack@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2004 02:56:03 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:56:02 -0800 To: DJ Delorie Cc: hjl@lucon.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix shared library build for libiberty References: <20041216230100.GA16067@lucon.org> <200412170200.iBH20euE027630@greed.delorie.com> <20041217020757.GA18875@lucon.org> <200412170210.iBH2Afpl027782@greed.delorie.com> From: Zack Weinberg Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200412170210.iBH2Afpl027782@greed.delorie.com> (DJ Delorie's message of "Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:10:41 -0500") Message-ID: <87brct8wfx.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 DJ Delorie writes: >> I believe libiberty is the only library which uses config/mh-CPUpic >> for building shared library. Other libraries use libtool for that, >> which doesn't use config/mh-CPUpic. > > I'd rather libiberty use libtool, then. Any reason not to? Would you > like to try changing it? libtool is evil and must be destroyed, and I'm not clear on why anyone is building a shared libiberty in the first place, but other than that it sounds like a good idea to me. zw