From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11773 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2005 22:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11391 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 22:23:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 22:23:18 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1OMNCYH020068 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:23:18 -0500 Received: from firetop.home (vpn50-46.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.46]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j1OMNCK01306; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:23:12 -0500 Received: from rsandifo by firetop.home with local (Exim 4.34) id 1D4RO2-0001n8-TG; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:23:10 +0000 To: cgd@broadcom.com Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] MIPS: Fix synthesized doubleword transfers (ping) References: <87sm3lhdo1.fsf@firetop.home> <87oee9ha6p.fsf@firetop.home> From: Richard Sandiford Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87oee9ha6p.fsf@firetop.home> (Richard Sandiford's message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:20:30 +0000") Message-ID: <87k6oxha29.fsf@firetop.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00625.txt.bz2 Richard Sandiford writes: > What I meant by the quote above was: suppose we have: > > ld ,sym + offset > > on a 32-bit target and: > > sym = 0x....4 > offset = 0x....4 > > sym + offset is aligned, but the individual values aren't. ...where "aligned" means to a doubleword boundary, in case that wasn't clear...