public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
	buildbot@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org,
	elena.zannoni@oracle.com, david.faust@oracle.com
Subject: Re: binutils snapshot builds
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 16:03:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msofjohs.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59999a82-ccb6-4298-95e8-d5e49b59c739@redhat.com> (Nick Clifton's message of "Fri, 24 May 2024 13:31:31 +0100")


> Hi Mark,
>
>> What do people think is a good policy?
>> - Just keep one snapshot a day after a year.
>> - Only keep snapshots for 1, 2 or 3 years.
>> - Just throw money at it, disks are cheap.
>>    Just buy another 600G when it fills up?
>
> Given that any of these snapshots can be reproduced from the git repository
> I do not see any great benefit in maintaining them long term.  My feeling
> is that is they will loose their usefulness once an official release is
> made, or possibly after two releases.  So how about:
>
>   * Snapshots are retained for at least 1 year after their creation.
>
>   * After that they can be culled at the discretion of the overseers
>     (and without needing to consult with the binutils project) as and
>     when they wish.

I would add, probably doing the snapshots in a weekly basis would be
enough, like GCC does?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-24 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-22 22:08 Mark Wielaard
2024-05-22 22:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add binutils-snapshots builder Mark Wielaard
2024-05-22 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] binutils snapshot steps should run in the git step workdir Mark Wielaard
2024-05-23  8:57 ` binutils snapshot builds Frank Scheiner
2024-05-23 11:36   ` Andreas Schwab
2024-05-23 13:30     ` Frank Scheiner
2024-05-23 23:15   ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-23 23:37     ` Sam James
2024-05-24  0:16       ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-24  0:27         ` Sam James
2024-05-25 17:40     ` Frank Scheiner
2024-05-26  0:31       ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-27 18:14         ` Frank Scheiner
2024-05-23 10:35 ` Nick Clifton
2024-05-23 23:32   ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-24 12:31     ` Nick Clifton
2024-05-24 14:03       ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2024-05-23 15:11 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-05-23 15:28   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2024-05-23 15:33     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-05-23 22:52     ` Sam James
2024-05-23 23:59     ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-23 23:41   ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-24  9:58     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2024-05-26  0:16       ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-28 14:35         ` Nick Clifton
2024-05-28 16:16           ` Mark Wielaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87msofjohs.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=buildbot@sourceware.org \
    --cc=david.faust@oracle.com \
    --cc=elena.zannoni@oracle.com \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=nickc@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).