public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>,
	binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] opcodes/arm: add missing ';' characters
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:08:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtarepz1.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <114cf7e5-aacf-ddba-4232-806278746aff@foss.arm.com>

Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com> writes:

> On 16/09/2022 14:21, Andrew Burgess via Binutils wrote:
>> I spotted a couple of places where the ARM disassembler produces what
>> seems to be some comment style text '@ Impl Def' without including a
>> comment character ';'.  In other places where we have similar messages
>> a comment character is emitted, so I suspect this was just an
>> oversight.
>> 
>> Fixed in this commit by adding two new comment characters, and
>> updating the expected test results.
>
> No, this is incorrect. @ is the comment marker on Arm; ';' is the 
> statement separator.
>

Wow!  OK.  So, I tested what you said, and you'd absolutely correct.
But does that mean all the places where the disassembler prints what (I
believe) is clearly a comment without printing '@' is actually a bug?
Or am I missing something really subtle here?

Here are just a few of the many examples that can be found in the gas
testsuite for ARM:

  sub     r0, r0, #32, 24 ; 0x2000
  add     r0, r0, #32, 24 ; 0x2000
  nop                     ; (mov r0, r0)
  subhi   pc, pc, #805306368      ; 0x30000000
  ldrh    r3, [pc, #-8]   ; 8 <foo>
  ldrsb   r2, [r3, #255]  ; 0xff
  ldrsh   r1, [r4, #-250] ; 0xffffff06
  ldrsb   r1, [r5, #240]  ; 0xf0
  strh    r2, [pc, #48]   ; 68 <bar>

There are many more, but they are all pretty similar in content.

Should I instead propose changing all these to use '@' ?

Thanks,
Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-22  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-16 13:21 [PATCH 0/2] Disassembler styling for ARM Andrew Burgess
2022-09-16 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] opcodes/arm: add missing ';' characters Andrew Burgess
2022-09-20 15:13   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-09-22  9:08     ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2022-09-22 12:39       ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-09-22 18:20         ` Andrew Burgess
2022-09-16 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] opcodes/arm: add disassembler styling for arm Andrew Burgess
2022-10-02 10:47 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Disassembler styling for ARM Andrew Burgess
2022-10-02 10:47   ` [PATCHv2 1/2] opcodes/arm: use '@' consistently for the comment character Andrew Burgess
2022-10-03 16:37     ` Andrew Burgess
2022-10-02 10:47   ` [PATCHv2 2/2] opcodes/arm: add disassembler styling for arm Andrew Burgess
2022-10-12 12:42     ` Andrew Burgess
2022-10-19 10:10   ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Disassembler styling for ARM Andrew Burgess
2022-10-31 14:59     ` Nick Clifton
2022-11-01  9:37       ` Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mtarepz1.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).