From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <binutils-return-68365-listarch-binutils=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13362 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2010 21:34:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 13321 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2010 21:34:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:34:45 +0000
Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so6289841wyf.0        for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.142.133 with SMTP id q5mr12603225wbu.3.1288647283118;        Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (rsandifo.gotadsl.co.uk [82.133.89.107])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm5617147wbc.9.2010.11.01.14.34.41        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);        Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,binutils@sourceware.org, rdsandiford@googlemail.com
Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] MIPS/GAS: Fix o32 LD to the base register
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010130023180.15889@eddie.linux-mips.org>	<g48w1w2b8a.fsf@richards-desktop.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com>	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1010181752570.15889@eddie.linux-mips.org>	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1010312127400.25426@eddie.linux-mips.org>	<87vd4gd995.fsf@firetop.home>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:34:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <87vd4gd995.fsf@firetop.home> (Richard Sandiford's message of	"Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:28:06 +0000")
Message-ID: <87mxpsd8y7.fsf@firetop.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:binutils-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/>
List-Post: <mailto:binutils@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:binutils-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2

Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com> writes:
> I still don't like the way that you're matching ECOFF and ELF offsets
> in a single test, allowing two load offsets when (for each format
> individually) only one offset is actually acceptable.  But patch 5
> is OK nonetheless.

That is, the relevant parts of 5 are OK nonetheless (i.e. the
parts that cover patch 1).  And I suppose that won't include any
of the ELF/ECOFF thing anyway.

Richard