From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1201 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2005 23:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1178 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2005 23:58:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2005 23:58:34 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CqglS-0003BM-00 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:58:30 +0100 Received: from pcusersgroup-link.cbr.comindico.com.au ([203.220.47.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:58:30 +0100 Received: from bje by pcusersgroup-link.cbr.comindico.com.au with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:58:30 +0100 To: binutils@sources.redhat.com From: Ben Elliston Subject: Re: Branches in CVS repository? Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87mzv761yx.fsf@au.ibm.com> References: <200501150003.j0F03Wka006774@sirius.codesourcery.com> <41EB9645.4040409@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pcusersgroup-link.cbr.comindico.com.au User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 Nick Clifton writes: > I agree. I can no reason to block this kind of behaviour and good > reasons to encourage it. So yes, I think that Mark should go ahead > and create his branch. In fact if he would like to propose a > paragraph to be added to binutils/MAINTAINERS that we be welcome as > well. The GCC and NetBSD projects (two that I know with plenty of branching activity) maintain a list of active branches. I think it would make sense to keep such a list for binutils -- most likely in the htdocs directory. Ben