From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9387 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2005 20:42:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9244 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2005 20:42:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2005 20:42:05 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0VKg5aW026018 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:42:05 -0500 Received: from firetop.home (vpn50-89.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.89]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0VKfwO08508; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:41:58 -0500 Received: from rsandifo by firetop.home with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CviMv-0001AF-JI; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:41:57 +0000 To: Nick Clifton Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Target-specific FDE pointer sizes (2/3) References: <874qh038y1.fsf@redhat.com> <87zmys1szw.fsf@redhat.com> <41FE15A5.8080308@redhat.com> <41FE1D13.3040104@redhat.com> <41FE5C53.9060805@redhat.com> From: Richard Sandiford Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <41FE5C53.9060805@redhat.com> (Nick Clifton's message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:26:59 +0000") Message-ID: <87oef5pbze.fsf@firetop.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2005-01/txt/msg00564.txt.bz2 Nick Clifton writes: > I see. In which case I will agree that the warning message would be wrong. Thanks, and sorry for all the hullabaloo. I did a poor job of explaining the situation. Both patches now applied. Richard