From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8201F3838022 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:53:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8201F3838022 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KkbWw0cJmz1r1N0; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:53:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KkbWv6xW2z1qqkB; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:52:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uuZxZd91pkZN; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:52:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: nbjCkE838wsN6ETlfuV71KqSPQxmjzTgdaOuCgKlVgWKKZodPwao/n4Nap9dM6Pd Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-189-26.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.189.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:52:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A58E52C36D0; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:52:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Nick Clifton via Binutils Subject: Re: RFC: Should we have all targets default to only creating an executable stack when explicitly requested ? References: <51664b3e-9dbd-65e2-00b3-7f7842f76ed4@redhat.com> X-Yow: .. I don't understand the HUMOR of the THREE STOOGES!! Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:52:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <51664b3e-9dbd-65e2-00b3-7f7842f76ed4@redhat.com> (Nick Clifton via Binutils's message of "Thu, 21 Apr 2022 12:28:50 +0100") Message-ID: <87y1zyirfp.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:53:03 -0000 On Apr 21 2022, Nick Clifton via Binutils wrote: > Other targets such as AArch64 and PowerPC do not this. Instead they > just ignore object files with missing .note.GNU-stack sections. They don't ignore them, they just use a different default. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."