From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31094 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2013 01:29:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31076 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2013 01:29:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:29:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r991TXsl004616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:29:33 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r991TWiv002323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 21:29:32 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Iain Sandoe Cc: Binutils , GDB Development Subject: Re: src.git test repository References: <87y565m7ma.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87mwmlkojs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 01:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Iain Sandoe's message of "Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:28:38 +0100") Message-ID: <87y563dyf8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Iain" == Iain Sandoe writes: Iain> somewhere to put the recipes/defaults corresponding to the existing Iain> checkouts would be handy. Iain> or did I miss it? I don't really think that's a good way to work, or something that should be supported, so I didn't investigate how to write it. The way we discussed on the list is to use top-level configure arguments to disable building various components. Tom