From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16429 invoked by alias); 23 May 2006 15:48:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 16417 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2006 15:48:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from intranet.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 May 2006 15:48:35 +0000 Received: (qmail 19302 invoked by uid 1010); 23 May 2006 15:48:33 -0000 From: Richard Sandiford To: Thiemo Seufer Mail-Followup-To: Thiemo Seufer ,binutils@sourceware.org, richard@codesourcery.com Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Better checking of ISA/ASE/ABI options for MIPS gas References: <20060522202627.GE30254@networkno.de> <20060523130537.GE9061@networkno.de> <877j4cc1ba.fsf@talisman.home> <20060523153720.GF9061@networkno.de> Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 01:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20060523153720.GF9061@networkno.de> (Thiemo Seufer's message of "Tue, 23 May 2006 16:37:20 +0100") Message-ID: <87y7wsagj2.fsf@talisman.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact binutils-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00416.txt.bz2 Thiemo Seufer writes: > Richard Sandiford wrote: > [snip] >> > Richard, do you care about the gcc update (if/when the release cycle >> > permits it)? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean here, but I'd certainly like to see gcc's & >> gas's option handling kept in sync, so the gcc equivalent of this patch >> is certainly welcome from my POV. And I'd see a long-lasting divergence >> between gas and gcc as a bug, so I'd be happy to use the discretion >> given to target maintainers and have the patch go in during stage 3. > > Well, the divergence is caused by missing MIPS32R2 with 64bit FP support > on the gcc side, which is a too invasive change for stage 3. IOW, the > re-sync of the option handling will be included in that patch, hopefully > in time for next stage 1. OK, that's fine too ;) Richard