public inbox for binutils@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opcodes/i386: use '; ' as comment character for intel style disassembly
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:39:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgfmcegz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOo97Ck0DhyG+OAogTmimx5s2MBXfxBOporU1KTzx4bmSA@mail.gmail.com>

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Burgess via Binutils
> <binutils@sourceware.org> wrote:
>>
>> While working on a disassembly related GDB issue I was comparing the
>> disassembly output for x86-64 in att mode and intel mode.
>>
>> I ended up trying to cut & paste some disassembly snippets from the
>> disassembler, and feed the instructions back through the assembler.
>>
>> For the att style disassembly this worked fine, but for the intel
>> style disassembly I ran into a problem as the '#' character, which is
>> used for comments in i386-dis.c was not recognised by either of the
>> intel style assemblers I have to handle (nasm and yasm).
>>
>> Searching online, every example I could find that has intel style
>> assembly syntax, used ';' for the comment character, and indeed, when
>> I switch '#' to ';', my same code assembled fine.
>
> But, ';' marks the end of instructions for GNU assembler:
>
> [hjl@gnu-efi-2 tmp]$ cat x.s
> .intel_syntax noprefix
> mov eax, edx; mov eax, edx;
> [hjl@gnu-efi-2 tmp]$ gcc -c x.s
> [hjl@gnu-efi-2 tmp]$ objdump -dw -Mintel x.o
>
> x.o:     file format elf64-x86-64
>
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 0000000000000000 <.text>:
>    0: 89 d0                mov    eax,edx
>    2: 89 d0                mov    eax,edx
> [hjl@gnu-efi-2 tmp]$

Thank you for pointing this out, I was not aware of this feature.  I
guess this patch is withdrawn then.

Thanks,
Andrew


>
>> In i386-dis.c we already have a bunch of characters that are
>> customised based on the selected syntax, see open_char, close_char,
>> separator_char, and scale_char.
>>
>> I propose to add comment_char to this list.  This will be '#' for att
>> syntax, and ';' for intel syntax.
>>
>> I've updated the gas tests to account for this change.
>
>
> -- 
> H.J.


      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-30  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-27 15:18 [PATCH] opcodes/i386: use ';' " Andrew Burgess
2022-08-27 15:18 ` [PATCH] opcodes/i386: use '; ' " Andrew Burgess
2022-08-29 18:24 ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-30  8:39   ` Andrew Burgess [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zgfmcegz.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).