From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 460303858C52 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:31:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 460303858C52 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673353865; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0yUWqPgU7oISrJPDiYxvsXrjpzkQqPndYcHE2GZ9xdM=; b=MuuCx2NgukSnAthiGCMsQkWkjPO+JcdAF+eQXhhwaF85yL2wAVwvwx6m5ujAbHU7UW6cKE CPdxqx4wSUgCYeQ1EoZgVAFGyy9O98VAavwY9uCvWwMFQ9uM/jTubHkccAMxcZnOkn7N5Q srQ9m4qpaXI83XkwFaUwwExLwQ8tDY8= Received: from mail-yw1-f197.google.com (mail-yw1-f197.google.com [209.85.128.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-125-708inZTxP4OyMEa4iz2iOQ-1; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:31:04 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 708inZTxP4OyMEa4iz2iOQ-1 Received: by mail-yw1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-4d1ef31a677so17657367b3.9 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 04:31:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0yUWqPgU7oISrJPDiYxvsXrjpzkQqPndYcHE2GZ9xdM=; b=kGY4dbiEt5mDmKgjR+1eKrC/3g4uuXIDU29Sflj8Hd0W1cBv4lFht1Kq+/Gs2Unj8T Tv3CeL4mBeRRNPgIk7S72AQIScq7UFytrrm1YRPgE5Z/avk0QAZr27eDCRaQ8nwQIr/z LkDLxaZIOVld0dMKW7VA0kPU1sqplxJ8Vlq8jP+neLyY9Ad/uDz5oFkh9pf7nW8o/I2o U+UnWp6fDjDuaCZN3TMyz4Jif5kH2bX/MQeANDjd3TYcTsW/QwCnoX6VymPBUcRKwqWT Cix00K96o5kRaNR78Dq5gvPrn7mYGHYh8yZB8xal30SfVUUdO131EQXagayxMu1FRCyX zqCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpHZlMfLx5RHFfIh80LjDCYw0cfKiXYoKdU4j+CoHsIB5QjHVz0 5yR3l3h2hzNU7W7gZEKBM3sG5fjWY5zYq5KkMSgquF4jU1X1+j8iL6qp3VG3DY+/7bgMcFrXsxm YNxKsS2rtRrEt0JAcqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a25:10c5:0:b0:7b4:329c:1737 with SMTP id 188-20020a2510c5000000b007b4329c1737mr18745734ybq.16.1673353864175; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 04:31:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXt3Qs7f2zEOtNOxOyxV+8c/3VemGs9V13kBcGYcqYLR6wl5UJ5jUDdCj+Z8yQu2Vp/qafgJiA== X-Received: by 2002:a25:10c5:0:b0:7b4:329c:1737 with SMTP id 188-20020a2510c5000000b007b4329c1737mr18745715ybq.16.1673353863970; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 04:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([79.123.71.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1-20020a05620a0bc100b006fa4ac86bfbsm7005514qki.55.2023.01.10.04.31.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Jan 2023 04:31:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8a1ce779-de70-f4f1-5cdb-e828a8677e6a@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:31:01 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gas/RISC-V: adjust assembler for opcode table re-ordering To: Jan Beulich , Palmer Dabbelt , Andrew Waterman , Jim Wilson , Nelson Chu Cc: Binutils References: <6c9f38b9-c582-3a1a-55ce-bb9966940a80@suse.com> From: Nick Clifton In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-GB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Jan, >>> PR gas/29940 > With 2.40 scheduled to be cut in less than a week, may I ask for an arch > maintainer's view here? > > Nick, to save a round trip, could you confirm (or otherwise) that this > fix is then also fine to go on the branch (after having gone into master)? If the arch maintainer approves, then yes, backporting this patch to the 2.40 branch is also approved. Cheers Nick