From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=Nzes=5B=martin.st=martin@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail8.parnet.fi (mail8.parnet.fi [77.234.108.134])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7281D3858D1E
	for <binutils@sourceware.org>; Wed,  4 Jan 2023 10:25:53 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7281D3858D1E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=martin.st
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=martin.st
Received: from mail9.parnet.fi (mail9.parnet.fi [77.234.108.21])
	by mail8.parnet.fi  with ESMTP id 304APPe8018181-304APPe9018181;
	Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:25:25 +0200
Received: from foo.martin.st (host-97-187.parnet.fi [77.234.97.187])
	by mail9.parnet.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC612A1471;
	Wed,  4 Jan 2023 12:25:24 +0200 (EET)
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:25:23 +0200 (EET)
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Storsj=F6?= <martin@martin.st>
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
cc: Mark Harmstone <mark@harmstone.com>, 
    Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>, 
    Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>, 
    Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>, 
    NightStrike <nightstrike@gmail.com>, 
    "wej22007@outlook.com" <wej22007@outlook.com>, 
    "zac.walker@linaro.org" <zac.walker@linaro.org>, 
    binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ld: Rename aarch64pe emulation target to arm64pe
In-Reply-To: <9be055ae-bfd1-b52b-3dd7-7148a6ead287@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <8b20aeef-dbd1-6ad2-85c1-d8191c31f540@martin.st>
References: <20221230024055.31841-1-mark@harmstone.com> <CAF1jjLsxDUx0FRKXs3zhRVMs=RokYoAbQRbQaDbZJtWOM5MmUA@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR08MB53259FF209098688F4E34A65FFF49@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <01e2b3d2-ad18-27ba-9761-82d2d521c00e@foss.arm.com>
 <f85ed8cb-87cd-add8-a64-1fd21a4c6dd@martin.st> <VI1PR08MB5325F158E541D2C4345B90A9FFF49@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <005b709d-acf5-f266-1e4f-41d2c3918ba3@harmstone.com> <CA+=Sn1=tcO+iUQaFXp_Wx1WBk83zfFzKLQTuQV-oOMS9U=t0_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <VI1PR08MB5325215B59D72AB9A49F7A60FFF49@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <237bf7b4-576-945a-58dc-245432e2d9@martin.st> <367317ba-108e-fde8-98d2-0be5146f28fa@harmstone.com> <9be055ae-bfd1-b52b-3dd7-7148a6ead287@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-FE-Policy-ID: 3:14:2:SYSTEM
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <binutils.sourceware.org>

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023, Nick Clifton wrote:

> This would create duplicated code sure, but not too much, and it
> would allow the linker to be compatible with Clang whilst still
> also retaining the aarch64 moniker preferred by ARM.

As this still is framed as "compatible with Clang" - does this mean that 
you still insist that GCC should use a different emulation name when 
calling the linker, than what Clang does, forcing lld to also start 
recognizing that new, different emulation name - different from the one 
that has been in place for 5 years?

// Martin