From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42ECD386193A for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 20:42:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 42ECD386193A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695933732; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=i1g+FJdOyoFeorBqpgAc9Yrdd8PJR9pjC+nWsrNTO4w=; b=Legi84vMhGO+dtKjLuToJOBu1QcVacrqaj8qGVzgcu4YF5NXKlLUnyVvfo9lYr4YU1hQGE /5UdFnc08V02vNiiAmkhioGO7heUShXi+pt1hasY5RweNWZ9B1ROX8PFGxT1UKy0c+Di7w d+t428N7BI4xxLGd/Uyj/u3pYG0p3Qw= Received: from mail-yw1-f197.google.com (mail-yw1-f197.google.com [209.85.128.197]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-651-WUZloSiDPeSiwIwfL8s7ow-1; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:42:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WUZloSiDPeSiwIwfL8s7ow-1 Received: by mail-yw1-f197.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-59ee66806d7so256626067b3.0 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:42:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695933730; x=1696538530; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:from:references :cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=i1g+FJdOyoFeorBqpgAc9Yrdd8PJR9pjC+nWsrNTO4w=; b=MRKVtGvIcrswPDuF6x/1K0QcrodwEBIDIuIq4edclMDyOqZ/CXtMpIyYSfZGYX9hgK eYnI7U2cD1zF1yZD4OCaLp6I3/ZPFCLyrnZR34lVRzccZvx3syYArSQvGvOQrz2VKwLw E2rWtliiVhHuFqt3zlR17tfmwgj8C2OEKiAfdUA7W0PbPu6SQwmc0iXWnYX+8oqpyReD xgMftD8fOfb7B7O+iq3IKj+/JnSJBvuNfJ+cAZQcYE6AVld2ExPkhT8J995qpAvDMuBb ibAThvy6CWwY/kywDG9n0O0uGQRfYGuWzZPgVQxWzw6+K2rzqfSdZBtHM5twAPc8a7jv T3AA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw8s/zH1mKs8Vk2wbh5NmonoG34p6eoqSB4+Z97BqReYXkG5PdL gxwujSIxUmAQfd6Tf8nP+XE2sp8vlUYc3cqzhe4Y337DVDJg6shoay8KfNwlTBHiIcGPgAzLGpr JRYX9L4JMxLcf1Nrsuw== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:cbc9:0:b0:59c:bab:eb4f with SMTP id n192-20020a0dcbc9000000b0059c0babeb4fmr2086789ywd.16.1695933730273; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:42:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IELGpiFOa7hI2m7ua2um/DbTJiZRfv5/FRi+t3DaHKUUQJmKI6WN7zrb/gF8Km3z3p0MZNMRg== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:cbc9:0:b0:59c:bab:eb4f with SMTP id n192-20020a0dcbc9000000b0059c0babeb4fmr2086780ywd.16.1695933730019; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.241] ([198.48.244.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e12-20020a81dd0c000000b0055a07e36659sm4763442ywn.145.2023.09.28.13.42.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8b2e929d-e5bf-1e13-3b5e-ced3871246d9@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:42:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: Binutils Code of Conduct To: Alexandre Oliva , Nick Clifton via Binutils Cc: Nick Clifton , ganandan@redhat.com, markobri@redhat.com References: <877cockjm6.fsf@redhat.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 9/28/23 15:27, Alexandre Oliva via Binutils wrote: > On Sep 26, 2023, Nick Clifton via Binutils wrote: > >> We are going to have a Code of Conduct for the GNU Binutils. > > This sounds like the decision has already been made. Is that so? Did I > miss any discussion with volunteer port maintainers like myself, and > other community members? I support Nick's decision, and I think it's the right decision to make for the project. -- Cheers, Carlos.