From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE32384A03E; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:57:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org DBE32384A03E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3330B1E581; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:57:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: PATCH: PR25830: Exclude gdb & gprof for pdp11 To: Stephen Casner , binutils@sourceware.org Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <8fd40490-f115-dbe1-cf0c-a9f4ba1fdb68@simark.ca> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:57:53 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: binutils@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Binutils mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:57:55 -0000 On 2020-04-17 5:35 p.m., Stephen Casner wrote: > Since gdb and gprof are not supported for the pdp11-*-* target, I'd > like to exclude them from the build to save time (and as a side > benefit, avoid complications with conflicting iconv libraries in some > environments). >From the GDB point of view, this is ok. Simon